To: Svartalfiar
I understand that dems rejected a bill that sounds like it would have done what we want. I wasn't sure that bill was only for that purpose. Let's assume that it didn't include, for example, money for Mayorkas to spend on waving in invaders faster than ever. That was my concern. Sometimes they describe a bill without mentioning everything in it.
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Oh yea no, this was an amendment to another bill, not a standalone.
Off the top of my head I don’t remember what the main bill was.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson