[Be Free]

"Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson: Today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how Section 3 can bar an oathbreaking insurrectionist from becoming President. Although we agree that Colorado cannot enforce Section 3, we protest the majority’s effort to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision. Because we would decide only the issue before us, we concur only in the judgment."

Ummm ... not to get too picky, but isn't this exactly what the USSC is supposed to do? That is, they're to decide the issue before them. Period. Why then the editorializing?

[Danie_2023]

“Ummm ... not to get too picky, but isn’t this exactly what the USSC is supposed to do? That is, they’re to decide the issue before them. Period. Why then the editorializing?”

Because, for whatever reason (and you can speculate)... some folks love to kick a gift horse in the teeth.