Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING! JUST IN: Supreme Court Sets Unusual Opinion Release For Monday Morning – Signals Ruling on Trump Ballot Eligibility is Looming
The Gateway Pundit ^ | March 3, 2024 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 03/03/2024 1:18:12 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man

The Supreme Court is set to issue a ruling on Trump’s ballot eligibility after he challenged a decision by the Colorado Supreme Court to bar him from the 2024 primary ballot.

In December the Colorado Supreme Court disqualified Trump from the 2024 ballot.

All 7 Colorado Supreme Court justices were appointed by Democrats – 3 of the justices dissented to the ruling.

The legal theories are based on Section 3 of the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment which states public officials who have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the US may be disqualified from public office.

Trump has not been charged with engaging in insurrection or rebellion against the United States.

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court on Trump’s ballot eligibility wrapped in early February.

The Supreme Court expressed skepticism as they heard arguments from Colorado lawyer Jason Murray. Even the liberal justices expressed concern.

“Why should a single state have the ability to make this determination not only for their own citizens but for the rest of the nation?” Justice Kagan asked.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; ballot; balloteligibility; coloradoballot; jasonmurray; lawfare; maga2024; scotus; supremecourt; trump; warontrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 last
To: MortMan; Fuzz

They provided ATM location data.


141 posted on 03/04/2024 7:34:45 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: lepton

I see that they had arguments on Feb. 8. From an article on today’s unsigned unanimous ruling:

“During Feb. 8 oral arguments, the majority of the justices had signaled openness to reversing a December decision by the Colorado Supreme Court to kick Trump off the primary ballot.”


142 posted on 03/04/2024 8:00:25 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

https://nypost.com/2024/03/04/us-news/supreme-court-orders-trump-back-on-colorado-primary-ballot-ahead-of-super-tuesday/


143 posted on 03/04/2024 8:03:27 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

Think the Left has for the most part surrendered least for now but they will be back..


144 posted on 03/04/2024 8:09:46 AM PST by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

That’s actually not a strong defense. The president is not the government or even the head of the government , he is the head of one third of the government. If the president decided to disband Congress and the judiciary by force, that would certainly qualify as an insurrection. So yes, the president could be guilty of insurrection. That’s not the case here, but to try to say the president could not be guilty of insurrection against his own government is a losing argument.


145 posted on 03/04/2024 8:10:07 AM PST by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263

“Think the Left has for the most part surrendered least for now.. “

I wouldn’t count on that.
I was just reading a very disturbing piece on the National Pulse.

Turns out for three years the Left has been working on a back-up plan if Trump wins and they can’t steal it. It is very plausible and very scary:

Step 1) Import 10 million illegals and distribute them strategically to Democrat strongholds in order to affect the census.

Step 2) Use the census data and partisan judges redistrict (gerrymander) to pick up congressional seats for 2024 - winning back a house majority.

Step 3) In the height of all irony, Democrats will refuse to certify a Trump victory on January 6, 2025.

Read more here:

https://thenationalpulse.com/

The name of the article is Democrats Say They Won’t Certify Trump Win in Congress.


146 posted on 03/04/2024 8:56:23 AM PST by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

I had heard they plan on Democrats refusing to certify a Trump victory on January 6, 2025.


147 posted on 03/04/2024 9:26:45 AM PST by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: mware

Kudos friends! Those who predicted a 9-0 ruling were right on the money…excuse me while I go eat my delicious 🐦‍⬛ crow!


148 posted on 03/04/2024 9:52:43 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263

Cant. At least using 14th amendment. Stated in this ruling Congress can NOT use it if Trump wins in November.


149 posted on 03/04/2024 11:38:51 AM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

Thank God it was 9-0. If even one went against the ruling they would say that one was right and others wrong. Would have been a Constitutional Crisis. Actually I think this was one.


150 posted on 03/04/2024 11:41:38 AM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: mware

Never underestimate the power of a corrupt Congress..


151 posted on 03/04/2024 2:29:12 PM PST by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

BTTT!


152 posted on 03/04/2024 2:56:16 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I thought I had read that the USSC had already ruled on this & that Mr. Trump would definitely be on the ballots. Am I reading news ahead of time here or what??? I have a friend who doesn’t like Biden but would definitely NOT vote for Trump. Thinks he is completely unsuitable as a president or maybe even as a person. The arguments for these views were explained & I tried to make it plain that, while he was possibly not a perfect person, he still did a good job of running the country when he had served previously & that Biden was an utter disaster in every sense of the word. Guess we ended up agreeing to disagree on this one. I will vote on election day & this other person will probably not vote.


153 posted on 03/05/2024 6:21:00 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson