Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joethedrummer
To be fair, she's aged poorly in jail. Still, she was never a prize.

As for the idea of charging the parents of shooters, it's a bit of a stretch, I think. But in this case, they were negligent, and gave him a gun. There are a whole lot of people who should not be parents, yet are having kids because they think it's the way it's supposed to be.

I'm not sure it's ever really been much different. Bad parents have been around for a long time. The problem is that the people filling in now as parents- school counselors, therapists, and the LGBTQ crowd are doing tremendous harm.

31 posted on 02/02/2024 1:19:17 PM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Repealthe17thAmendment

they DIDNT GIVE HIM THE GUN...the weapon was bought to target practice at a gun range, with the understanding it would be his when he turned 21. The gun was locked up the day of the shooting, and the kid unlocked it. This sets a dangerous precedent, you could apply this to every crime committed..”you didnt raise him right, so youre guilty too”....ill be shocked if they get a conviction, but the defense attorney is awful...she couldnt get these people out of jail almost 3 years later...ridiculous.


48 posted on 02/02/2024 3:29:04 PM PST by basalt (qb's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson