Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chad C. Mulligan

>>>A very large percentage of Southern soldiers were Scots-Irish. Sons of migrants from the lowland Scotland who had a long and bitter history of oppression by the Church of England, and wound up in the southern Appalachians because they weren’t wanted in the northern states either. These families had no connection to the rich Piedmont landowners who owned slave plantations. They fought because they hated being imposed upon by central governments of any stripe.<<<<

The election of Lincoln was imposing what on the Scots_Irish? If they were poor they owned no slaves. How was Lincoln’s election going to be oppressive to them?

As far as I know it was the South’s fear that eventually the north would impose their will on the south in regards to slavery. And thus when an abolitionist was elected, they bolted. Lincoln’s initial thoughts on how to end slavery was to do it gradually and possibly compensating slave owners for their losses. Lincoln was adamant in his belief that slavery was wrong. But less sure on the best way to go about ending slavery. Candidate Lincoln was not in favor of immediate abolition.

During the war immigration continued to swell the ranks of the North with fresh military aged men. The North was able to not only build ships for it’s own navy, but to build ironclads for other countries. At the end of the war one of four southern men of military age was dead. And the south had zero compensation for the loss of their slaves. If you ask me, the Confederates have nobody to blame but themselves.


40 posted on 12/28/2023 9:15:00 PM PST by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: BJ1
BJ, you need to do more reading outside the establishment syllabus. Most importantly the Beards, but do pick up Jim Webb's little book. Unless you've got a reading impediment, you can finish it in one evening. He's an engaging writer. You might want to move on to his novels about Vietnam and its' aftermath as well. One United States Senator who wasn't an idiot. And a Democrat truth-teller I might even have supported for President.

Another eyeopener would be Thom DeLorenzo's The Real Lincoln.

41 posted on 12/28/2023 11:07:22 PM PST by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson