But by adding Russia-adjacent nations to NATO, that move will be next. NATO is nothing about protecting the nations within, and everything about expanding and punishing nations that choose to NOT be WEF globalists.
The US and NATO have no intention of containing Russia - they want to eliminate Russia. Why? Because it’s all about power to them.
Again, the biggest enemies of the American people and her constitution do not lie in Russia but in Washington, DC. From open borders to lawless democrat cities to the trannies and pedophiles to unsustainable national debt to just plain trying to destroy our constitutional republic, the feds are working overtime to do what Russia has no intention of doing - destroy our nation.
“But by adding Russia-adjacent nations to NATO, that move will be next. NATO is nothing about protecting the nations within, and everything about expanding and punishing nations that choose to NOT be WEF globalists.”
Oh, BS. You need to stop listening to late night talk radio.
“The US and NATO have no intention of containing Russia - they want to eliminate Russia. Why? Because it’s all about power to them.”
You’re clueless. If we had wanted to eliminate Russia we would have done it in 1992, right after the collapse of the USSR, when Russia was in turmoil and disarray; and we were coming off a huge military victory in Iraq, and at the top of our game.
“Again, the biggest enemies of the American people and her constitution do not lie in Russia but in Washington, DC. From open borders to lawless democrat cities to the trannies and pedophiles to unsustainable national debt to just plain trying to destroy our constitutional republic, the feds are working overtime to do what Russia has no intention of doing - destroy our nation.”
We can walk and chew gum at the same time. We can do both; and we are working toward that end. But, don’t you realize that our global foes are very much involved in fomenting the destruction of our country? Would you suggest we fight one evil, and ignore the other evil that is striking us when we are pre-occupied with former?