If someone "try's" to rob a bank w/o a weapon, but doesn't succeed, that's a criminal act.
If someone "try's" to murder someone with their bare hands, but isn't successful, that's a criminal act.
The president of Uzbekistan can "Try" to run for President of the United States even though he could never legally be POTUS.
What the courts are doing, by letting these clearly frivolous lawsuits proceed is in fact malfeasance in office. It's an official abuse of power.
To put another way, these courts are acting unlawfully and in an extraconstitutional manor.
“That key word, “Try” can be applied to any and everything that is unlawful or unconstitutional.”
Good point but would you say that if someone “tried” by legal means, to do something that was legal, it would not be breaking a law, or in this case be unconstitutional?
I can see, though, that high pressure or repetitive “trying” could be harassment.