Replies

"Really? You're going to believe that VANITY FAIR is going to get this scoop?"

I never said I believed it. That's your assumption. I read the article, and it mentioned the original article was in Vanity Fair, and that other news sites picked it up. It's called searching for an original source, which is what you basically asked for, since you thought it was MSN.

My good FRiend, "you're" was meant in a broad sense, not directly at you.

Maybe Murdoch met with DeSantis.

Maybe he didn't.

But what happened to trust and verify? Reason? The MSM isn't a friend of conservatives?

I noticed recently, that FReepers are posting more and more sensational stories with breathtaking headlines from low information "conservative" website. When you scratch just a little (meaning, read the story...) it's fake.

Just yesterday, we got this whopper - Kerry Says US Farm Confiscations Not Off the Table. Sounds bad, right? It would be, if he said it. Except Kerry never said it. Fooled almost 200 FReepers.

I'll go one step further...these agitprop headlines are probably written by Jar Shakers so the Trump and DeSantis ants tear each other to pieces, so we won't ask the ONE question that matters: How are you going to flip 38+ electoral votes?

We NEED Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona or some combo theirin.

And this is against the backdrop of mail-in voting, which isn't going away.

If neither of these guys can tell us how the f he will flip these EC votes, he don't deserve the nomination.

Parenthetically, conservatives who lap up this stupid reporting and don't perform basic due diligence, are pawns of the left.