Replies

The PCR 'test' was actually not a test and was based on the influenza virus.

The Chinese said an isolated sample of the Covid virus was 'not available' so they used genetic mapping software, a technique that could not possibly provide an accurate Genome for Covid (because the lockdown excuse was based on the lie that Covid was 'novel' i.e., none of us had any immunity to it). The genetic mapping software accesses a library of pre-existing or documented virus sections to patch in missing pieces of the genome their constructing. Well, a 'novel virus' never seen before cannot be assembled out of documented parts of previously known viruses.

So the Chinese released their incorrect genome for Covid 19 around February 2020 and the pharma's said they picked up the genome and got 'right to work' making a vaccine. They used China's genome at a time Trump was saying it was the 'China Virus' because the pharmas said the isolated sample of the Covid virus was 'not available'.

The only people who claimed to have a valid isolated sample of the Covid-19 virus were labs controlled by Fauci via funding.

Early in the plandemic, I posted some content in which I came to believe the researchers were claiming there was no Covid virus in order to compel the CDC to provide them with isolated samples instead of only giving them to insiders. I thought it was a reasonable tactic and I supported it - put up or shut up. The CDC is a medical institution which supposedly relies on facts and data and as such, should be able to provide samples as proof. I still think this is a fair tactic - if they are hiding isolated Covid virus samples for some reason, make them provide samples as proof it exists or we all turn our backs on them in unison. It's not wrong to demand the CDC act like they have integrity and serve the public interests. The CDC shouldn't be able to just provide isolated samples to those whom they 'like' or control.

The following info is from Dr. Judy Mikovits who worked at the NIH labs and crossed Fauci. She was picked up by FBI and held for 48 hours without charges according to her lawyer - the FBI says otherwise. She was fired amid claims she had lab work in a notebook at home ( a violation). She said she was framed because she infuriated Fauci by refusing to hand him her research (other content) for him to give to someone else to claim as their own. She was picked up by FBI and her lab work was confiscated and Fauci gave it to someone else to represent as their own.

Mikovits said she was the one who developed the cell line (type of cells used by labs to test drugs etc) often cited in the Covid research literature. She said every time she heard someone had an isolated sample of the Covid virus, she went and read through the research. The first several layers of documentation all said they used the isolated Covid virus, which strangely the pharmas, CDC, and China couldn't get, but she said when she read beneath those layers she always found they had not used the isolated virus. Instead, they used a 'lavage' which is not a valid technique for 'vaccine' development or research.

Normally, the Covid virus is isolated and used to prove that it's the correct one creating the illness by exposing subjects to it, and they then become ill will Covid. That's the way to prove the authentic virus creates an illness.

A lavage is a 'wash' of multiple viruses and is not a valid source because you can't be sure any of them caused Covid.

Pharma shills on FR screamed at me that the isolated virus is used everywhere, daily, freely available etc. yet somehow the pharmas and China and the PCR didn't use it, and the CDC issued statements saying they didn't have the isolated sample. A FReeper pm'd me that he'd tried to purchase isolated sample of Covid but was told by the biological materials distributor that it was 'unvailable'.

Dr. Mikovits said that she didn't believe the research they showed re Covid existed in humans, because according to the documentation, information was gleaned from in vitro samples of monkey kidney cells. For this reason she didn't believe 'Covid' as documented by research exists outside of monkey kidney cell line that she developed years ago for scientists to use to test drugs.

When I posted information about Mikovits, the trolls were shouting she was a criminal and should be ignored. Body Language Ghost (expert in body language) watched a video interview with Mikovits and found her truthful. I don't see why Mikovits subject herself to more hostility (the NIH/CDC already doesn't like her, she was picked up by the FBI before) to lie; it had to be hard for her to come forward and talk about work she personally conducted after what she'd been through.

I believe her statement that Covid exists only in monkey kidney cell lines used for research makes sense because I think it was a biowarfare effort and you wouldn't release a contagion that could harm the elites or stay resident and infectious permanently, and for which there was, initially, no treatment. Or, you wouldn't release something you engineered because it's heritage can be traced back to the person(s) developing the biowarfare agents.

During complete lockdown, Nancy Pelosi shut down San Francisco and then called a hair salon she frequents to open for her so she could get her hair styled. She arrived without a mask. Nancy Pelosi and other elites and MSM figures only pretended to fear infection but took masks off as soon as the cameras weren't rolling - that includes Fauci. There were photos of them at private parties all standing next to each other.

Where did 38 million cases of influenza go? Dr. Brix raised a firestorm of speculation when she corrected herself in an address to reporters by say, "Well, we don't have flu anymore.'

Robert Kennedy Jr. said in an interview the CDC combined the much larger number of lethal pneumonia cases with the very small number of flu deaths and portrayed it to the public as flu deaths to create fear and drive people to "GET THE FLU VAX! GET THE FLU VAX!" At work we were admonished to be responsible employees and get the flu vaccine to avoid sickening others or failing our job responsibilities by getting the flu when it was avoidable.

Kennedy Jr. made a point of asking people he met if they knew of anyone who had died of the flu, and I think he said out of all the times he asked, 1 person said 'yes'. Kennedy noted that if flu deaths had ever been as high as the CDC claimed, we'd all know someone who died of it. I checked the CDC documentation and noticed their seasonal flu numbers shown in charts were titled 'PI'. Looking further, I discovered they were showing they combined pneumonia and influenza for reporting purposes. That allowed them to conceal number of pneumonia deaths versus flu deaths, and push the flu vaccine.

But when I checked those charts/tables last year, they were titled PIC, for Pneumonia/Influenza/Covid. They combine them and the only way I can imagine 38 million cases of flu in 2019 dropped to 1,800 cases in 2020 is that combination - shifting numbers around.

I've wondered why there was no isolated sample of Covid available to ordinary researchers (not Fauci funding recipients) or vaccine pharma, or those developing the PCR 'test'. Dr. David Martin has tracked down portions of the Covid virus as shown in compromised research and said patents exist for portions of it, which blows a hole in the entire 'novel' virus and pretty much everything else the NIH and CDC ever said. If Covid doesn't exist where they claim it is (baseball game superspreader event) with a fake PCR test, then how can Dr. Martin find patents on portions f it, unless Covid exists but not in the human population?

I've wondered if Covid is in the 'vaccine' because genetic material from monkey kidney cells would be destroyed by the human immune system if injected, but mRNA technology 'protects' material foreign to the human body by enveloping it in a lipid pouch. If Covid is in the 'vaccine' then it would explain why the vaccinated are proving to be more likely than unvaccinated to get Covid.

I posted an article by someone who collected letters from the CDC stating that the CDC does not possess isolated samples of many common viruses for which we have 'vaccines'. This is not normal, but what does it mean? The Bayh-Dole Act of the 1980's changed the laws to allow employees of the Federal Government to patent drugs developed by the FDA. Is it possible this extends to viruses and the CDC doesn't want to provide or admit to possessing isolated samples of that group of viruses because they patented portions or helped to develop them?

The stories, statements and documentation about the Covid 'vaccines' and Covid just never add up. The public was faced with the task of proving the Covid "vaccines" were harmful by a criminal CDC which never proved to the public the "vaccines" were 'safe'. Our public servants threaten those who asked 'too many questions' or made obvious statements of fact.

If the documented Covid virus was not loose during the pandemic, and the PCR could not identify Covid, where is it?

Even the efficacy numbers for the Covid 'vaccine' were an obvious farce for which the CDC and FDA were personally responsible. By using relative percentages instead of absolute percentages, the medical regime deceived the public into believing they were reducing their risk of getting Covid by 95%, even nurses said that in recorded PSA's. IN reality, according to Absolute Risk calculations, the 'vaccines' would have been expected to reduce individual risk by about 1%. The CDC and NIH knew this and deceived the public into exposing themselves to an experimental vaccine developed using the wrong virus and diagnosed using an invalid PCR test. This isn't incompetence; it is pure evil.

The public (including myself) and various doctors and researchers would simply not engage in the kind of speculation which the regime is deeming 'misinformation' if the NIH, CDC, and FDA ever did their jobs and served the public. But instead, they lied and expected trust, broke all the rules and crossed red lines freely, withheld information and threatened those who spoke up, including firing and stripping credentials. In return these 'public servants' expected us to listen to the lies, irrational statements and unconstitutional/illegal demands and remain perfectly silent, or else!

I think our speculation would ordinarily make the CDC try to do a better job of...oh I don't know...telling the truth, publishing open source documentation, and making isolated samples freely available. Then, when facts about the virus were discussed among the field of private and public research and others, the public would have a reason not to speculate and be branded 'misinformationists'. You don't want us to gossip and speculate? Then release the isolated virus to researchers, tell us the truth instead of lying to us, and we'll stop speculating.