I read elsewhere the parents were actively involved and concerned and working with the school and therapists about his violent personality. One parent was supposed to be in the room with him during class and this had been the first day in weeks that he was on his own.
The next question is, if the parents were concerned, how did he have access to the gun....and how did he manage to tuck it in his waistband and remain undetected as they searched his backpack?
“I read elsewhere the parents were actively involved and concerned and working with the school and therapists about his violent personality. One parent was supposed to be in the room with him during class and this had been the first day in weeks that he was on his own.”
Exactly. The dysfunctional, mentally ill little shite should have been removed from that classroom months ago. In the interest of “inclusion” his teacher and every other student in that school was placed at risk of his proven and predictable violent behavior.
Society MUST get back in the habit of isolating, and if necessary exterminating, dangerous individuals. We are committing cultural suicide by letting them continue to infest our environment.
And his parent(s) should be held criminally liable for this shooting as well.
But if you had an issue like that, why would you have a gun in the house? Or not make it way more inaccessible than this one was.
Although the kid seems like some kind of idiot savant of evil. That note seems rather complex for a first grader and what’s with the “barricading” the classroom doors? Plural doors? What kind of barricade is a kid that size going to build?
They are lucky he just shot the teacher and didn’t kill all his classmates.
I can't imagine choosing to go along with the kid every minute, as opposed to everyone just agreeing that this was a case screaming for home schooling.