Absolutely dead nuts, spot on accurate. Well done and well said.
Worthy of repeating and re-posting.
The corrupt, illegal voting procedures WERE challenged before the election ... the courts in which the challenges were raised ignored or rejected the challenges.
Every.
Single.
Time.
According to our corrupt courts, nobody has standing to challenge illegal election procedures before the election, because the election hasn’t happened yet and nobody has been harmed.
According to our corrupt courts, nobody has standing to challenge illegal election procedures after the election, because the election has already occurred and the point is moot.
What I am seeing as a repeat offender, both here and in many many other venues and cases, is this concept that nothing is actionable until there has been harm.
I think that standard is pure, unadulterated BS.
When an officer of the law sees an armed individual aiming his weapon at another individual, that officer is not required to wait for harm to occur before taking his service weapon, and neutralizing the armed assailant.
So how is it that the courts have adopted this stupidity that they cannot act until there has been harm? This is perverse!
Manifestly there are myriad cases where the courts, as matter of ethics, and morality absolutely should, and must, act before there is harm. Manifestly the failure of Courts to act absent harm has directly resulted in untold numbers of harms. But they can’t be sued for it. They can’t be held accountable for it. So they don’t have to care about changing it.
You want to talk about “the root of all evil,” so far as our legal system is concerned, I think what I’m outlining here is the beating heart of it.
When it is observed that harm is imminent, it is the ethical, moral, and righteous duty of anyone with the power to avert it to step in and do so. Our courts do not operate that way, and because they do not operate that way, they neither serve ethics, nor morality, nor righteousness in any sense.
Our legal system is FUBAR!