Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Have you ever seen so many weasel words in a “scientifically-based” article?

The lying bastards.

“is a more debatable issue - certainly appeared to pose - more likely to become - remains a possibility - are sharply reduced - were believed to have been - An unknown number of Americans - though not so much the other way around - may provide - can vary based on - range in vulnerability - the role the unvaccinated could play - kind of a patchwork - changing over time, and it’s changing over space - will become indistinguishable - vaccines appear to - more likely to be - somewhat more likely to - hard to assert that - likely to remain a presence - are almost certainly - how much is hard to pinpoint - much trickier - could accelerate the emergence - some of which are bound to be - are much more likely to - that can spawn - most of them are - If it drives - become a more plausible prospect - That could be a lethal mistake”


63 posted on 11/03/2022 6:15:55 PM PDT by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jobim

That article is political messaging. That is all.


67 posted on 11/03/2022 6:23:05 PM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson