Posted on 08/23/2022 11:57:15 AM PDT by AJFavish
Abstract
The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease has no precedent. The many alterations in the vaccine mRNA hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein. However, the immune response to the vaccine is very different from that to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. We show evidence from the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines questions them as positive contributors to public health.
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedirect.com ...
Saved for later. Research into the vaccines done after SARS-1 indicated reduced immune systems as well. One of the reasons those vaccines were never brought to market.
We keep seeing articles from legitimate medical journals pointing to actual or potential hazards from the mRNA vaccines, yet the medical establishment as a whole continues to aggressively promote them. And the MSM continues to label as “conspiracy theories” any negative findings of researchers.
glad to see you are looking into this crime.
I hope you guys can put together a class action lawsuit that will dwarf the tobacco settlement.
I also hope these evil people will be brought to justice for what they’ve done.
good luck, allan
>> We show evidence from the VAERS database
Are professional credentials required to enter data into VAERS?
Instead of “evidence”, would it be more accurate to say “statistical correlations”?
PING
Thanks for posting. I am struggling because I am in healthcare and not vaccinated. I am being targeted and cannot find another job because they all require the vax.
I will dive in later because immunology is a field I am familiar with.
We are praying, because we are about to loose 2/3 of our income.
I cannot fathom the implications of turning mRNA loose inside a healthy human.
Stephanie Seneff is generally not considered legitimate by people with actual medical, biology or virology degrees.
That has replaced scientody.
https://voxday.net/2015/08/21/scientistry-is-not-scientody/
(Note the publication date precedes COVID-1984 and the jabs by years.)
Highlights:
mRNA vaccines promote sustained synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
The spike protein is neurotoxic, and it impairs DNA repair mechanisms.
Suppression of type I interferon responses results in impaired innate immunity.
The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.
Codon optimization results in G-rich mRNA that has unpredictable complex effects.
~~~~~~~
Can we decline the push to stuff our 6 month olds with these weapons yet?
(Regardless of whether they were known to be weapons before this or not?)
~Easy
Hi. I disagree. And my opinion has as much weight as theirs. Aren’t opinions fun? :)
Not a doctor, but after suffering much obfuscation, misdirection, and general confusion, its now clear that VAERS was created as one channel for information that could be used to create a set of testable hypotheses with regard to any vaccine. Could it be used for something else? Perhaps, but it’s not clear how.
But, it does at least work at some level for its original purpose, as it was the initial source that prompted the Israeli study that conclusively established that the current mRNA vaccines carried an elevated risk of myocarditis for young men and boys.
This is an article from science.org from 2015. One interesting paragraph:
Biologist Bruce Hay of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena and colleagues took a different approach to blocking GnRH. Rather than rely on animals’ immune systems to create antibodies, he and his colleagues engineered a piece of DNA that—when packaged inside inactive virus shells and injected into mice—turned their muscle cells into anti-GnRH antibody factories. Because muscle cells are some of the longest lasting in the body, they continue to churn out the antibodies for 10 or more years. Both male and female mice with high enough levels of the antibodies were rendered completely infertile when Hay’s team allowed them to mate 2 months later, the team reports online today in Current Biology.
Feel free to send her money, then.
It’s good that you realize that what Seneff does isn’t science.
You should look into the Novavax Covid-19 vaccine, which is not an mRNA or DNA vaccine. I still have significant questions about it, but if you had to take a Covid-19 vaccine, it should be Novavax in my opinion.
I wouldn’t trust the word of that hit piece for what she’s doing.
I’m not an IFLS person.
>> it does at least work at some level for its original purpose
that would be good
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.