Once again ‘Dr.’ Malone making unsubstantiated and misleading claims. Why do so many still believe the things he says?
No scientific basis for claims of ivermectin’s success in Uttar Pradesh, India
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/12/facebook-posts/no-scientific-basis-claims-ivermectins-success-utt/
“No evidence suggests a causal link between ivermectin recommendation and the decline of COVID-19 cases in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh”
“Why HCQ and Ivermectin were removed from India’s Covid-19 treatment protocol”
And then there's this:
Death Count In 24 UP Districts 43 Times More Than Official Covid-19 Toll
I know the ivermectin true believers will poopoo any fact checking of the Uttar Pradesh claims, but for the rest of us, I’ll add yet another link to yours.
If you do an internet search on Uttar Pradesh Covid you will find many pages of links debunking the ivermectin success claims the other links are touting. Who to believe? Like many here, I doubt claims made by both sides. But it is good to at least consider both sides. So:
“Not only did it not hasten the end of that alpha wave, but it didn’t prevent the delta wave,” Mark said.
Mark cited research where scientists looked at data for all deaths in India, and found that certain populous districts in Uttar Pradesh had no reported deaths at all for several months.
“So either you have to believe that ivermectin prevents you from dying of everything — car crashes, cancer, homicide, suicide — or, that the data is just garbage and you can’t interpret it,” he said.
Ivermectin may help covid-19 patients—but only those with worms [—Really ?!?!] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4017143/posts
High prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections among primary school children, Uttar Pradesh, India, 2015
https://idpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40249-017-0354-7
So, yes, ivermectin may well have been beneficial for Covid patients in Uttar Pradesh — because ... worms.