Posted on 05/27/2021 6:53:53 AM PDT by PROCON
If you're so "bureaucratic" as to identify the dead murderer as a "suspect" then you simply must say he allegedly "had two semiautomatic weapons". It makes as much sense. (Well, at least the dead murderer wasn't included in the victim count!)
They have in some states. Max is 7 rounds.
Kalifornia is still 10 rounds. . . . .
Well, lets see...California...
Must be 21 years of age to buy-Check.
Handgun and rifle registration-Check.
Background checks-Check.
Ban on A-s-s-ault rifles.-Check.
Ten day Waiting Periods-Check.
Red Flag law-Check
FBI checks-check.
Only California approved hand guns allowed-Check.
Tax on ammo-Check.
Background check for ammo purchases-Check.
Age limit of 21 for all guns. Check.
Micro-stamping -Check.
Age limit for ammo-Check.
Gun free zone-Check.
Ban on large magazines-Check.
No private individual sales-Check.
No buying out of state and bringing them into California.
https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/what-legal-way-bring-a-firearm-california.htm
So what new scheme and dream will they come up with..
I always like to remind everyone that when California drafted the first A-s-s-s-ault rifle ban they also included lever action rifles in it. The lever action part was later removed, and the bill shelved.
Then California released Pat Purdy from a mental institution, allowed him to buy guns passing waiting periods and lying on the Federal forms.
He then shot up the Stockton school yard, killing several students and himself.
The shelved bill was pulled out and passed so fast before any opposition could be mounted against it.
He had bad intentions and was planning a lot of shooting. He needed 11 magazines as California restricts purchase of any magazine holding more than 10 rounds. Anti-gun laws don’t lessen gun violence as bad actors always find a work around.
We need to learn his history of mental illness and if he was on or ever was on psychotropic drugs. These are the markers for people violently snapping in most cases. Of course, the media won’t tell us most of the time. Often it comes out much later about the mental illness or being on psychotropic drugs.
Plenty of guys live like this guy, they’re quiet, they do their jobs for years and make no fuss or muss.
That’s now a “RED FLAG” and they should be investigated, prosecuted for pre-crimes, and imprisoned or executed? I mean hey, if it saves one life it’s worth it, right?
Meanwhile Islamic, Antifa, and Marxist terrorists are immune to such scrutiny.
Just two pistols and eleven magazines?
Piker.
So it happened at a union meeting, and the surnames of the victims were Megia, Singh, Balleza, Hernandez, Romo, Rudometkin, Alaghmandan, Lane and Fritch. It took six writers to write the story. The headline said, “weapons,” instead of handguns. And he went postal.
There are hundreds if not thousands of news stories on this shooting with every possible detail. However, I have yet to see even one article on how many were injured, only the number of deaths. Otherwise it’s only “Multiple people are injured”. Are reporters so lazy they can only report what someone else said, instead of thinking for themselves
How many people does it take to write an article?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.