Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden Administration To Look At Wealth Tax: Yellen
https://trishintel.com ^ | March 14, 2021 | By Staff Writer

Posted on 03/15/2021 9:19:36 AM PDT by Red Badger

You can’t spend $1.9 trillion you do not have.

So, now the administration is apparently giving weight to the likes of populist socialists like Senator Elizabeth Warren, and considering a wealth tax.

When asked about the idea on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen admitted that, “that is something we haven’t decided yet and we can look at.”

She did note that President Biden campaigned on his intention to raise taxes for individuals and corporations as well as capital gains and dividend taxes.

A group of progressive lawmakers led by Senator Warren recently introduced legislation that would create an annual 2% tax on the net worth of households between $50 million and $1 billion. And, an additional 1% on those above $1 billion.

Critics says a wealth tax would not be constitutional. It would effectively be “taking” property from an individual that rightly owned the property. Indeed, in order to even have an income tax, Congress needed to pass a constitutional amendment in 1913.

Meanwhile, critics of a wealth tax also say a system like that would ultimately penalize the middle class by causing billionaires to find “loop holes” to invest and keep their money offshore. The tax, they say, could even drive those with wealth out of the U.S. much like high taxes under Hollande in France.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: elizabethwarren; georgestephanopoulos; janetyellen; massachusetts; taxhike; taxhikes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Red Badger
Senator Warren recently introduced legislation that would create an annual 2% tax on the net worth of households between $50 million and $1 billion.

And, an additional 1% on those above $1 billion.

Damn! I knew I should have quit at a billion...that last 1% shoe-shine I did yesterday is going to kick my ass!

41 posted on 03/15/2021 9:43:04 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

It sank.....................


42 posted on 03/15/2021 9:43:32 AM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
Not Constitutional

Says the Rats: "We don't need no steenkin' constitution!!!"

43 posted on 03/15/2021 9:43:42 AM PDT by RatRipper ( Democrats and socialists are vile liars, thdieves and murderers - enemies of good and America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xp38
I wonder if they regard my salvation of any value. According to Jesus it is more valuable than all the wealth on earth.

Oh, they got that covered.

There will be a million-dollar tax on being saved.

44 posted on 03/15/2021 9:44:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In Jean Shepherd’s book “In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash” (from whence “A Christmas Story” evolved”), Chapter 28 details what happens when the Personal Property Tax Assessor comes around.


45 posted on 03/15/2021 9:44:40 AM PDT by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“The millionaire athletes will be shocked...................”

If it makes them feel better, perhaps we ‘take a knee’ for them.


46 posted on 03/15/2021 9:44:47 AM PDT by BobL (TheDonald.win is now Patriots.win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It sank.....................

Still have to declare it on this year's (or another year's) taxes. It was afloat at some point.

47 posted on 03/15/2021 9:45:26 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I’ll render unto Biden what is Bidens. 10% for the dementia guy right? :)


48 posted on 03/15/2021 9:48:35 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

Yes. I think we may have reached the point where concerns actions that are clearly unconstitutional are just met with a shrug and a comment that “we can’t worry about little technical matters like that”.


49 posted on 03/15/2021 9:50:47 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Would the Escalades and bling be considered assets? And if they add to your total, cause the wealth tax to kick in? Or is it only property, land, buildings, stocks, bonds?


50 posted on 03/15/2021 9:55:01 AM PDT by milemark (non blogger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And everyone will have very intrusive tax forms to complete valuing your entire net worth, that you will get to complete each year, making sure the government (and big tech) have a thorough understanding of everything about you.


51 posted on 03/15/2021 9:55:15 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“taking” property from an individual that rightly owned the property.

Oh how the democrats miss the Obama years but this time it won’t end.


52 posted on 03/15/2021 9:56:14 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Critics says a wealth tax would not be constitutional. It would effectively be “taking” property from an individual that rightly owned the property.

Congress has varied progressive income tax rates from time to time from their inception. Immediate post-WWII years saw the highest bracket paying a whopping 94% rate.

Re: https://files.taxfoundation.org/legacy/docs/fed_individual_rate_history_nominal.pdf

Since the income tax rate has virtually always been progressive and rates have varied over time - why would a 'wealth' tax be considered unconstitutional on the basis that it takes someone's property. Ahhh........ income tax has always taken "someone's property". Am I missing something?

53 posted on 03/15/2021 9:57:39 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; All
Income taxes are bad enough but at least it is on recurring income.

But a wealth tax will kill the goose that laid the golden egg.

Once you take someone's wealth away from them, the pot will be empty. It doesn't replenish itself.

These democRATS are cutting their noses off to spite their faces. Throwing the baby out with the bath water.

They are so stupid it is unbelievable.

54 posted on 03/15/2021 9:58:25 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

“’If you can’t pay it, you lose your asset.’
I would destroy it before I let them take it. F them!”

No! Sell it. Sell it for slightly less than the cutoff for the tax, at least you still have something.


55 posted on 03/15/2021 9:58:57 AM PDT by milemark (non blogger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The ‘wealthy’ know how to safeguard their money - that’s one reason they have so much.

Then the wealth tax will moved down - until ‘elite’ commies are taxing people who keep the economy going... and then people like us who prop them up...

How predictable and stupid.


56 posted on 03/15/2021 10:00:31 AM PDT by GOPJ (Race: the Achilles' heel of the Democrat Party. Telling the truth about race destroys the race card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt
But a wealth tax will kill the goose that laid the golden egg.

Both of which are taxable assets.................

57 posted on 03/15/2021 10:01:37 AM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Same concept as estate tax, only yearly.


58 posted on 03/15/2021 10:03:06 AM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
"...These wealth taxes have failed miserably everywhere they’ve been tried..."

As if that has ever, EVER stopped Leftists from pursuing their ideological goals.

59 posted on 03/15/2021 10:03:17 AM PDT by rlmorel ("I’d rather enjoy a risky freedom than a safe servitude." Robby Dinero, USMC Veteran, Gym Owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: milemark

In order to pay the wealth tax, you have to come up with the cash - do you sell to someone else, who likely also needs to cash out assets to pay the tax? Where are the buyers coming from?

Or do you hand over title to the government?

So either the markets tank or stocks become government assets, or both.


60 posted on 03/15/2021 10:04:06 AM PDT by AdSimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson