Posted on 02/23/2021 10:08:07 AM PST by Red Badger
California Democrats Reps. Anna Eshoo and Jerry McNerney have written to a dozen cable, satellite and streaming companies calling on them to better combat disinformation--which they principally identify as Fox, Newsmax and One America News Network (OANN)--and grilling them on what they plan to do about it.
Fox said such letters set a "terrible" precedent.
Those were the only two signatories on the letters, but they are both on the powerful House Energy & Commerce Committee.
The legislators came just short of calling on the distributors to drop those channels, but not by much. They said that "some purported news outlets have long been misinformation rumor mills and conspiracy theory hotbeds that produce content that leads to real harms," then hammered Fox, Newsmax and OANN, the latter two which became former President Trump's news outlets of choice after something of a falling out with Fox over its coverage.
Fox called Arizona early, and correctly, for Biden, and also called the race for the Democrat along with outlets the legislators did not criticize.
Also Read: Roku Says it Is Not Booting OANN
Among the answers to questions they wanted from the companies was "Are you planning to continue carrying Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN [fill in the platform] on TV both now and beyond any contract renewal date? If so, why?"
The letters went to top executives at AT&T, Verizon, Roku, Amazon, Apple, Comcast, Dish, Charter, Cox, Altice USA, Alphabet (Google), and Hulu.
The legislators have identified the sources of misinformation they want to know what the distributors are doing about as principally Fox, One America News Network and Newsmax, all of which they assert are right-wing outlets that spread election misinformation specifically and misinformation about politics in general.
Also Read: Trump Trashes Fox
Eshoo and McNerny want the following questions answered:
1. "What moral or ethical principles (including those related to journalistic integrity, violence, medical information, and public health) do you apply in deciding which channels to carry or when to take adverse actions against a channel?
2. "Do you require, through contracts or otherwise, that the channels you carry abide by any content guidelines? If so, please provide a copy of the guidelines.
3. "How many of your subscribers tuned in to Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN on [Fill in the company's distribution platforms] for each of the four weeks preceding the Nov. 3, 2020 elections and the Jan. 6, 2021 attacks on the Capitol? Please specify the number of subscribers that tuned in to each channel.
4. "What steps did you take prior to, on, and following the Nov. 3, 2020 elections and the Jan. 6, 2021 attacks to monitor, respond to, and reduce the spread of disinformation, including encouragement or incitement of violence by channels your company disseminates to millions of Americans? Please describe each step that you took and when it was taken.
5. "Have you taken any adverse actions against a channel, including Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN, for using your platform to disseminate disinformation related directly or indirectly to the Nov. 3, 2020 elections, the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection, or COVID-19 misinformation? If yes, please describe each action, when it was taken, and the parties involved.
6. "Have you ever taken any actions against a channel for using your platform to disseminate any disinformation? If yes, please describe each action and when it was taken.
7. "Are you planning to continue carrying Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN [fill in the platform] on TV both now and beyond any contract renewal date? If so, why?"
The letters comes in advance of a hearing this week on the role of traditional media in promoting disinformation and extremism ---streaming is apparently now in that category, or at least has been included on that side of the ledger as opposed to social media companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter, which have taken most of the disinformation heat.
OANN was reviewing the letter at press time. Fox News and Newsmax were not immediately available for comment.
“As the most watched cable news channel throughout 2020, Fox News Media provided millions of Americans with in-depth reporting, breaking news coverage and clear opinion," said the company in a statement. "For individual members of Congress to highlight political speech they do not like and demand cable distributors engage in viewpoint discrimination sets a terrible precedent.”
“The House Democrats’ attack on free speech and basic First Amendment rights should send chills down the spines of all Americans," said Newsmax in a statement. "Newsmax reported fairly and accurately on allegations and claims made by both sides during the recent election contest. We did not see that same balanced coverage when CNN and MSNBC pushed for years the Russian collusion hoax, airing numerous claims and interviews with Democrat leaders that turned out to be patently false.”
Newsmax also reported on the letter Monday, saying the Democrats were Waaging an assault on the First Amendment.
I guess these people need to be reminded that most people in the Soviet Union and East Bloc simply did not believe the propaganda that Tass and Pravda would serve out day after day. Are they that ignorant and thin skinned?
The proper answer is “Our obligation to our stockholders requires us carry anything the viewers wish to see and are willing to pay for, and on which we can profitably sell advertising.”
Dear Sirs,
With respect to your recent query about how we are justified to carry these channels ... we are justified because it annoys your sorry socialistic butts. We invite you to go eat a 10# bag of sugar free Haribo bears in a single sitting.
Another example of the Dems using power. When we gave the GOP power, they wet their pants.
Wish a congressperson would put together a Montag of the ms Lying over and over and over again a in and present it and say “if you are going to do away with conservative Stations, then you must do away with these liberal stations too
"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me." - Martin Niemoller
dump cable tv. basic bundle makes you pay for the lying LEFTIST channels.
Stream just the channels you want to support.
The LEFTIST channels get substantial revenue from cable subscriber fees.
CNN gets half of its revenue from cable subscriber fees.
How many of your subscribers tuned in to Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN
Enough to put them in a huge money loss if they dump them and never recover.
Democrats are losing ground by the day they are disparate to try anything and the hole keeps getting deeper.
The stabbed snake squirms
A short drop and a sudden stop.
These communists are FLAGRANT.
This is disgusting.
Keep pushing it, commies.
Communist just doing what pinko commies do best, silence opposition.
Misinformation? Fake news? Why don’t they go after CNN, MSNBC, Drudge?
That is their base......................
High on my list of intense sudden rage triggers for me personally.
Those of you who still maintain any sort of relationship with leftist Dems at work, neighborhood, family gatherings and so on (I am not guilty) please ask them how they can take away freedom for the thought with which they disagree but expect others to grant their side total freedom. They probably won't understand you.
It’s because, as they say, they won’t “tolerate intolerance”. And of course, they are the divine arbiters of what/who is deserving of tolerance. All kinds of deviance and evil-no differing opinion.
Dims hate free speech and everything else the US Constitution protects for us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.