Super-COVID strikes in California: San Diego man, 30, with no travel history is diagnosed with mutant UK strain on same day Colorado reports SECOND suspected case

Daily Mail ^ | 31 December 2020 | RACHEL SHARP and NATALIE RAHHAL

[Drew68]

China has always been in it for the long haul. Why would anyone think they would stop after their first salvo?

They're partying without masks in China. This idiotic response belongs to us.

[Vaduz]

If they don’t want it, then why?

Because 90% who die from the virus are older people some think they are luckier then the old people wishful thinking is often the last one.

[Vaduz]

I will see you at your funeral.

[whitney69]

“Because 90% who die from the virus are older people some think they are luckier then the old people wishful thinking is often the last one.”

In the Forbes article I read they are also talking about doctors in their 60’s refusing. In talking with some medical professionals, I get the feeling they are waiting to see the results of actual in the public reactions or discoveries. that feeling tells me they don’t feel comfortable with it in that it hasn’t been tested enough and results determined consistent. They didn’t know about a lot of the problems, or weren’t talking about them, prior to giving it to the public. I think they are still testing it in the real world.

wy69

[wildcard_redneck]

"I will see you at your funeral."

I doubt it. I just got over an infection by your super-scary COVID and I have experienced worse flus. The only lasting side effect I have is an increased disdain for hypochondriacs who try to evangelize their fearful world view. COVID has a 99.99% survival rate you pathetic coward.

[Vaduz]

I just got over an infection
Did you?.

[Vaduz]

In the Forbes article

Try the CDC reports not reporter reports.

[whitney69]

“Try the CDC reports not reporter reports.”

And you trust the CDC?

“The agency’s response to the worst public health crisis in a century — the coronavirus pandemic — has been marked by technical blunders and botched messaging. The agency has endured false accusations and interference by Trump administration political appointees. Worst of all, the CDC has experienced a loss of institutional credibility at a time when the nation desperately needs to know whom to trust.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/09/28/cdc-under-attack/

I trust the CDC about as much as I trust politicians which is what they really are. Remember, they have an agenda just like everyone else. There’s is to keep their budget so they can have a good roof over their heads with funds in excess of $6.5 billion. And if you propose they are going to take the responsibility of saying the vaccine is not going to have bugs with the millions of people they are planning to inject, you may be waiting a while for that one.

And if doctors are turning down the use of it at the moment, as many as 20% publicly the sources will admit to, and we don’t know how many are stalling and staying shut up, then trusting the CDC is no different than trusting Biden or Harris. Neither group wishes to commit to things that may get them hammered. And when the average of developing medication in the US takes around 10 years, I don’t have a lot of trust in slam dunk development.

As of March 2020, there were just over one million professionally active physicians in the United States. So that 20% computes out to 200k doctors. That’s about equivalent to cities the size of Birmingham, AL, Tacoma, WA, Salt Lake City UT, and other noted cities. I see a concern by professionals. Those numbers make me thing about it. And that’s just the doctors. There are many more in the health professionals like nurse, specialists, midwives, rest home attendants that we don’t know about. Trust the CDC? About a far as I can throw them.

wy69