Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS
Twitter ^ | 8 Dec 20 | Anonymous Patriot

Posted on 12/08/2020 5:59:53 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS.

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: braking; scotustexas; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-314 next last
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

TX, FL and other red states. Are making a clear proclamation that they consider Biden to be illigetimate.


161 posted on 12/08/2020 9:09:50 PM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

If the election were to lead to a secession and/or a civil war could the MSM still ignore it?


162 posted on 12/08/2020 9:14:21 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred

you do recall how that turned out,,,,,, right?


163 posted on 12/08/2020 9:14:22 PM PST by Segovia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch
> I think the SCOTUS wants to resolve all the cases in one neat package and not hear appeals from a dozen or so litigants.

I hope you are right.

164 posted on 12/08/2020 9:20:18 PM PST by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LEFTISTS RUIN EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The blue states have seceded from America. We fight for a constitutional America, and this time we fight on the same time. I don’t see decision, I do see massive red state resistance and possible nullification of unconstitutional actions.


165 posted on 12/08/2020 9:20:37 PM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: central_va
On the same side, and no secession.
166 posted on 12/08/2020 9:26:01 PM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
Texas as a plaintiff has essentially filed a lawsuit against the four fraud states. These defendants have until 3pm Thursday to respond in writing.
167 posted on 12/08/2020 9:30:32 PM PST by Hootowl99 (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl99

And if they don’t meet the deadline what happens?


168 posted on 12/08/2020 9:34:15 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: glimmerman70

Is it even necessary to bring “all the evidence?” It seems as if the only evidence necessary is the fact that all four of these states stopped counting before midnight. That tallying process alone was unconstitutional and voids any ballots counted after 11:59 PM on November 3rd. That, plus the fact that the election changes were never voted on by the state legislatures, which was 100 percent illegal. It’s my understanding that the aim is to simply void the election results from those four states.


169 posted on 12/08/2020 9:37:01 PM PST by ponygirl (An Appeal to Heaven )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

They consider AZ and NV hopeless? Or they just don’t fit in with this particular case?


170 posted on 12/08/2020 9:39:36 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nfldgirl; All

The judiciary is vast and spread out all over.

For a single person, for an individual to try and right the wrongs that happened Nov 3 and after, it’s a struggle, and an uphill battle through the courts.

But if you are serving in a capacity of a State and you sue other states, you go straight to the top, to the US Supreme Court. It’s called “original jurisdiction”.

Now then, even if you’re a state suing a state, the US Supreme Court doesn’t have to hear your case.

But in this case, Texas is suing four other states that committed great wrongs to our country.

And the total number of Electoral votes of those four states is enough to change the outcome of the election.

Because one of the questions the US Supreme Court will ask is will it make a difference? And the answer is yes, yes it will, it can change the outcome of the election.

So when the Supreme Court told the four states that Texas gas sued to be ready by 3 pm Thursday to respond, it means GAME ON!

Now those states can be expected to file papers saying Texas and all the states now joining Texas have no business trying to get in their business,

But Texas and the states joining in have all rights to do what they are doing.

The case boils down to this:

Is your legal vote in Texas worth as much as a vote in one of the four states that allowed so many illegal votes?

The answer is no, a Texas vote is not worth as much as a vote in a state that allows so many illegal votes. Texas voters do not have equal protection of their votes before the law as a vote in those four states that allow so many illegal votes.

If a state can allow so many illegal votes, why should anyone in Texas bother to vote? The Texas vote will be for nothing because the other states allowing so much fraud can wipe out the Texas voters.

Here’s an everyday example:

You go to a federal surplus auction. You want to bid on a piece of equipment. You have a competitor that can print all the dollars they want on the spot and the auctioneer will accept the counterfeit dollars but you must show real dollars. Why should you even bother to bid? Are you treated equally in the auction? No, you’re not treated the same.

So you take the auctioneer to court and sue them for treating you unequally, from some bidders they will accept counterfeit dollars but you’re not allowed to counterfeit because you have to obey the law.

So at this crooked auction, only crooks can win the bids and take the goods. Is the court going to allow that?


171 posted on 12/08/2020 9:39:42 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Very well stated!


172 posted on 12/08/2020 9:46:05 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

States are lining up. CW II may become hot. Texas is definitely sending a message. SC MUST uphold the Constitution or there is going to be a bigger mess on their hands than a bunch of antifa and snowflake rioters.


173 posted on 12/08/2020 9:58:07 PM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

I hadn’t heard. Thanks for the good news.


174 posted on 12/08/2020 10:19:54 PM PST by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

Good news about Giuliani..........hope he gets enough rest before diving in too soon.


175 posted on 12/08/2020 10:27:26 PM PST by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

.


176 posted on 12/08/2020 10:41:19 PM PST by nutmeg (Mega prayers for Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
If a party to a court action does not respond, typically the other party wins by default. A lawyer (which I am not) can clarify the applicability of this generalization because it is not a hard and fast rule, Court has discretion, which can lead to other ways of dealing with failure to conform with an order.
177 posted on 12/08/2020 10:43:04 PM PST by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Every other state is disenfranchised if they are forced to accept a president Elected by fraud


178 posted on 12/08/2020 10:43:50 PM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HandBasketHell

I think all nine Justices are now reading the rest of this developing situation and realize that what happens over the next week...could have serious implications where states start to give intentions of lessening participation in the federal government. States are all supposed to be on an even level...if that doesn’t exist, the Constitution falls apart.

The whole voting apparatus is screwed up, with no way for the Justices to rectify/correct this....other than throwing the vote out, and putting the House method into play. But even beyond that...something massive has to occur before the next mid-term...to resolve how voting is conducted, or you repeat this entire exercise again.


179 posted on 12/08/2020 10:46:42 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

If what we have been told is correct that Biden is socialist and extreme and going to make us like Venezuela and the Supreme Court isn’t willing to stop it then I guess the ball is in the court of We The People?

Those electors will vote Biden Monday in those four states at the State Capitols.


180 posted on 12/08/2020 10:58:45 PM PST by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODYS BUSINESS, REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson