Sure, overtly, currently Chinese controlled 5G is even worse, but 5G itself is unsafe and unnecessary—except for in a massive surveillance state. (Yeah, some remote surgery procedures may be tough and therefore impractical until we get a safer version of that level of capability, but so it goes.)
Ahhh, you got it all wrong. That’s 70s technology thinking. IOW, decades ago reception technology was very crude. Signal strength had to be high to transmit long distances. As reception technology improved the amount of power required to transmit long distances decreased as signal processing capabilities increased.
Want a practical example? Cellphones. Your 15 year old flip phone has more than 4x the transmit/receive power of a typical smart phone. The cellphones of the 90s have even more than that.
Starlink uses =solar powered= satellites and very smart ground antennas. Their power is in the signal processing, not in the signal. High power processing of low power signals. That’s the money maker.
you are so full of crap. 5G is unsafe.. WOW, Starlink does not use 5G.. WOW learn something before you open you mouth..