Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

Good God what a nutter site. Let me guess... you are a believer in daily colloidal silver. Might as well rub the crystals, steam your hooha, and get your chakras aligned while sunning your perineum and getting a coffee colonic.

5G is not particularly risky since it can not penetrate deeper than a couple of layers of cells (negligible skin cancer risk). Starlink is not even that. Several orders of magnitude lower signal strength exposure and Starlink freq are much less ionizing.

I am not obnoxious but your smooth brain may interpret someone who actually understand and can instantly debunk a nutcase site like the one you linked as such. It is better if you stick to the kids table when it comes to sciency stuff.


27 posted on 12/07/2020 6:36:15 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

LMAO! TY LTGM!


29 posted on 12/07/2020 6:45:12 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Yep. I knew that would drive you over the top.

And BS—you industry shill.


30 posted on 12/07/2020 6:55:18 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson