Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/27/2020 10:42:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
😨😲 Oh no. NOT a WaPo fact check. Srs bidness there.
2 posted on 09/27/2020 10:44:45 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Marxists have no soul and will do anything and everything to gain power in America. Anything!


3 posted on 09/27/2020 10:45:06 AM PDT by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So is Twitter going to be flagging or deleting Newsom’s post?


4 posted on 09/27/2020 10:48:33 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sin. Joe Biden led off the Clarence Thomas hearings with an out of context redacted quote as well.


5 posted on 09/27/2020 10:54:03 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Joe Biden- "First thing I'd do is repeal those Trump tax cuts." (May 4th, 2019)l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Democrats are just shocked that GOP politicians would resort to political means to accomplish their political ends.

Only Democrats are allowed to do that.


6 posted on 09/27/2020 10:54:51 AM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It’s not even that. Watch the whole clip. She was describing the issue and then at the end she said it’s up to the Senate.


7 posted on 09/27/2020 10:56:48 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There is nothing wrong with holding back a Senate vote if the Senate is of one party when the president is of another. The Senate is doing a kindness to the Judge. If the president’s party wins the election, the senate will vote on the other side. If they don’t, and you make the Senate vote, they will simply vote no. And the president can renominate him 3 months later. But without voting the Senate is allowing themselves to vote only once after the election. Remember they are not stopping him from getting to the bench by not voting. They of course would vote no. They are stopping the vote because he may be the guy they would vote for if they lose the election. The senate is saving their own face. The nominee was never going to get the job, at least before the election.


8 posted on 09/27/2020 10:58:24 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Scalia a “stauncher” conservative than Thomas?


9 posted on 09/27/2020 11:05:44 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
What is really not noticed here is that everyone, including McConnell, Obama and all the other Democrats, thought (knew?) it was a foregone conclusion the Republicans would confirm Garland if he came up for a vote.

In other words, Republicans wouldn't agree to Garland's confirmation because it was someone Obama put forth.
Really?. Then why were they pushing so hard for a vote?
11 posted on 09/27/2020 11:10:24 AM PDT by lewislynn ( It's not your color stupid, it's your attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

12 posted on 09/27/2020 11:21:06 AM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Trump should come right out and say to Biden in the debate:

“Are you believing your own lies or is your memory that bad???”


16 posted on 09/27/2020 11:51:36 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

When they’ve lost the Wapo they might as well give up.


17 posted on 09/27/2020 11:58:00 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If dems are so certain they will win (legitimately) and have already stated they will add at least 3 liberals to SCOTUS then why do they care if Barrett is placed on the SCOTUS? Of course we know the reason is the SCOTUS was part of their plan to win by cheating because they have Roberts under their thumb. This really messed up their plan A and now much switch to plan B, whatever that is. All we know for certain is that it involves cheating.


18 posted on 09/27/2020 12:03:01 PM PDT by TonyM (Score Event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Judge opinions almost always state the argument of the side they are in opposition with in very strong terms followed by a BUT and then proceed to dismantle that argument. This is how judges give their opinions.


21 posted on 09/27/2020 1:06:27 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson