Why do suburban women support riots and arson?
For the same reason they wear a stupid COVID diaper on their faces even while driving alone. They’re morons.
They are only seeing the Burning, Looting, and Murder (BLM) in the cities. They don't live in cities, so it doesn't bother them. They think they are geographically isolated from the chaos. And they are, at least for now.
They dont and are coming back to the Trump camp
I’m a suburban woman in a Philly collar suburb. My observations (anecdotal) on why so many women here are turned off by Trump is because “he’s mean”, especially on Twitter. Couple that with a weird brainwashed belief that Democrats are “nice, inclusive, and for the little people” and the newly created “white privilege” guilt and you have a trifecta.
But we’re not all morons, and we aren’t monolithic, I know there are many around here like me, who don’t buy into the BS and don’t get all their news from the mainstream media.
Because OrangeManBad is what they are told from their news sources.
Rape fantasies involving rioting monkeyboys.
“Why do suburban women support riots and arson?”
Because they think it is “edgy.” They live the edginess vicariously.
“Why do suburban women support riots and arson?“
They don’t. Trump’s supposed “gender gap” is a myth - a fake news narrative.
In 2016 there was supposed to be a huge gender gap - that’s why everyone was sure he was going to lose. But he won, and he did just fine with women - even though he was running against a woman destined to be the first female President!
Listen to the spontaneous “I love you!” chants happening at recent Trump rallies. Those are women‘s voices chanting that - and a lot of them are from the suburbs.
Yes, the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh suburban counties are Democrat strongholds - they are filled with Trump haters, and of course half are women.. But that doesn’t prove the gender gap is real.
Trump’s supposed “gender gap” is part of an insulting fake news narrative - the idea that in order to support Trump, there must be something wrong with you - you must be deplorable - you must be a bitter clinger - you must be racist - you must be a college dropout - you must be a chauvinist.
In order to construct this narrative they describe the typical Trump supporter as being a white male without a college degree. That way, in one fell swoop, they can imply his supporters are ignorant, racist and chauvinist.
This is how identity politics works:
If whites support him, he must be a racist.
If college dropouts support him, he must be ignorant.
If females don’t support him, he must be a male chauvinist.
But in reality, there is nothing wrong with more Trump supporters lacking a college degree. It means he is reaching out proportionately to middle class Americans, 75% of whom did not finish college. It is the Democrats who should worry about that statistic - it means they are failing to reach the middle class.
Similarly, there is nothing wrong with more Trump supporters being white, since 70% of voters are white. Again, it is the Democrats who should worry - their support is disproportionately limited to non-white urban centers.
Come November, we shall see how much of this “gender gap” was real, and how much of it was just another fake news narrative, designed to smear President Trump and his supporters as chauvinists.
I suspect it is all fake news.