Posted on 09/02/2020 9:29:13 AM PDT by sickoflibs
The question of course becomes when one is out after curfew illegally brandishing a weapon you’re lot allowed to own at property you have no connection to are you actually defending yourself or are looking for a fight.
No presumption at all. If what I said does not apply to you then I’m not talking about you. But we both know there are plenty of people on this site and elsewhere that does apply to. And the fact that you are obviously taking what I said personally shows that on some level you DO think it applies to you. Which is on you. Not me. No strawman. You just proved me right. Again.
Given that you are now just repeating false information, I doubt there is much to say. You should know by now if you were even remotely well informed that just about every thing you said in your first sentence was false.
There is no evidence whatsoever that Kyle Rittenhouse was "illegally brandishing a weapon" or that he was not allowed to own that weapon, or that he was at property he had no connection with. So once again you just posted a straw man argument, but this time based on lies.
Oh look and now you’ve run to insults. So we both know you have no facts. We’re done. Bye
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.