For the sake of argument, if 329 murders over 25 years was accurate how the hell could that number be significant?
How would 329 murders compare to the total number of murders over the same 25 year period? Or as a percentage of the > 300M population?
I think what they’re really saying is that getting hit by lightning is probably more likely than being killed by a right winger. You know, us right wingers that hold violent protests with burning and looting...
Statistically you’re more likely to catch a Clinton ordered .25 behind ear.