Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pontiac

I’ll bet the clothes on my back that they don’t have the legal authority to do so.


4 posted on 07/30/2020 6:44:44 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Rats Just Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

‘I’ll bet the clothes on my back that they don’t have the legal authority to do so.’

and I’ll bet the loincloths covering my genitals that the ‘law’ is whatever the authoritative infrastructure wishes the ‘law’ to be any point in time...


9 posted on 07/30/2020 6:48:10 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

“The court held that a woman’s right to an abortion was implicit in the right to privacy protected by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.”

How is the right to take a drug with a 70 year track record of safety any different than the right to have an abortion? It should be a decision between patient and doctor after thorough consultation on the risks. My body, my choice. Trump needs to push this. Use their words against them. A right to privacy as stipulated in Griswold v Connecticut, and Roe v Wade is not unique to pregnancy. We have to convince people that Covid is treatable or we will never get the country back.


65 posted on 07/30/2020 8:33:47 AM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson