Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge asks full federal appeals court to reconsider decision forcing him to drop Michael Flynn case
CNBC ^ | 08/09/2020 | Dan Mangan

Posted on 07/09/2020 12:29:11 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: SpeedyInTexas

Do lower court judges typically ask higher courts for en banc reviews?

This looks odd to me.


41 posted on 07/09/2020 12:43:46 PM PDT by sauropod (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
Predicted

Yup. Same here. I'm surprised he didn't wait until the day before he had do act on the previous order. Came close, but I figured he'd be as petty as humanly possible.

42 posted on 07/09/2020 12:44:07 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: damper99

It is time for Trump to put an end to this NOW!!


43 posted on 07/09/2020 12:44:35 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All

#FLYNN Breaking: Judge Sullivan asks entire DC Circuit Court of Appeals to review previous order forcing him to dismiss Flynn case. Sullivan lawyer Beth Wilkinson’s 69 page filing reads in part: “The panel’s decision threatens to turn ordinary judicial process upside down...— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) July 9, 2020

It is the district court’s job to consider + rule on pending motions, even ones that seem straightforward. This Court, if called upon, reviews those decisions—it does not preempt them. This case satisfies requirements of Rule 35 + en banc review should be granted.” @RobLegare pic.twitter.com/zrOltA87yZ— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) July 9, 2020


44 posted on 07/09/2020 12:44:39 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Normally, your prediction would be correct.

However, the circuit court is filled with liberal activists who will likely be more than happy to go En Banc, you know, for the cause!

As was postulated, this creep has likely already canvassed the rest of that circuit courts members and already knows what the result will be, which is they will be happy to rehear the case.

45 posted on 07/09/2020 12:45:03 PM PDT by Pox (Eff You China. Buy American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Sullivan’s job is to stretch the case out until the election.


46 posted on 07/09/2020 12:45:17 PM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover
It’s all about the delay. Nothing more. He wont sign the dismissal until the entire Supreme Court puts the pen in his hand.

And even then it will take a week for him to scratch out his signature.

He can still refuse to do it, to physically sign the order.

Then they'll have to remove him from the case, or maybe from his job entirely, which will take time, during which Flynn is silenced.

If they remove him from his job (by forcing him into emeritus status for instance) he will get a very cushy sinecure at Harvard or some other fancy school of his choice. I bet it's being arranged right now.

47 posted on 07/09/2020 12:45:22 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrats' John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

The judge needs a “kneeling” policeman...


48 posted on 07/09/2020 12:45:23 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

A) He’s furious that someone is telling him how to conduct
his court.
B) He’s furious that he got caught.
C) He’s stalling to keep Flynn from being set free.
D) He’s trying to affect the election.
E) All of the above.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

F) He’s being blackmailed as payback for getting his criminal son off on murder & drug charges?


49 posted on 07/09/2020 12:45:27 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

SPJNK.


50 posted on 07/09/2020 12:45:30 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Is it legal for a judge to be VINDICTIVE against a defendant?

It could be viewed as impeachable misbehavior on the part of the judge. IMHO it is.

51 posted on 07/09/2020 12:45:51 PM PDT by Rapscallion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas
He is owned by K Street types due to some special treatment his kiddie porn loving son got in the court system. He just keeps trying to drag this out past election day. Once Flynn has the potential real prison sentence eliminated he is going to reveal some interesting things. If Biden wins then Flynn's value to the GOP evaporates.
52 posted on 07/09/2020 12:46:06 PM PDT by robowombat (Orthodox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Sullivan is brainless.


53 posted on 07/09/2020 12:46:12 PM PDT by mulligan (an En bbnnEeThe tC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Sullivan’s “treason” comment in court doesn’t qualify?


54 posted on 07/09/2020 12:46:24 PM PDT by jjotto (Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nesnah

I don’t believe he’s currently under a gag order and is free to speak. However, discretion being the better part of valor, he’s better off not saying much yet. Having read the majority opinion of the three judge panel I can’t imagine the full panel of judges having much to stand on, legally. But they do have numbers on their side.


55 posted on 07/09/2020 12:46:28 PM PDT by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“when Biden wins?” Are you serious?


56 posted on 07/09/2020 12:46:31 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

In a game of checkers with Joe Biden I think Sullivan would lose.


57 posted on 07/09/2020 12:46:35 PM PDT by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nesnah

He knows where the bones are, and the Deep State Swamp is scared.


58 posted on 07/09/2020 12:46:48 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dave911

Seriously. Does he think the cat can be forced back into the bag? He must know he’s flirting with disaster.


59 posted on 07/09/2020 12:46:55 PM PDT by softengine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

That is what I would do if I were Powell I would demand this judge recuse himself immediately!!!


60 posted on 07/09/2020 12:47:08 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson