Posted on 07/09/2020 10:34:05 AM PDT by Loud Mime
Half a century ago while the Republicans slept ...
Missed in the author’s analysis of the positioning of the Constitution being on the right wing is that doing so gives leftists the ability to call the right wing: fascists.
They remember the Great Promise of a Socialist World which was betrayed by the right wing of the socialist movement when Hitler attacked their beloved USSR.
HCUUAC had the Communists on the ropes and then the media and Hollywood and academia launched an assault on the government. by the end of the 1960s and throughout the 1970s we had thousands of bombing campaigns by far left extremists with international connections.
Today those militant Communist traitors have cushy jobs in academia at prestigious institutions.
I was there. They were not sleeping. They were busy electing and then s-—tcanning Nixon. While doing nothing about the dammed immigration bill the dems and LBJ rammed through in 1965.
Canning scamming sleeping no difference - their attention was elsewhere, missing even the egregious takings of private property.
Too bad they didn’t stop RMN before he laid the foundations for the radical liberal movements while creating a special class of citizen who now have the eastern half of Oklahoma.
The man was the worst President since W. Wilson; only Clinton surpassed him. Zero just took advantage of the earlier foundations.
Yeah I remember too well
Not to worry - if DJT wins again, they will get on with major bombing campaigns. If he loses, then just look to China to see what’s next in XI Jinping’s plans
The Left is ALWAYS trying to re-write history which of course, includes our Constitution. Read it and learn and agree.
“Half a century ago while the Republicans slept ...”
Right?! I have only one question, were they asleep, or did they actively look away?
I am almost certain it is the latter. I believe both sides, sit together in a back room, lighting their cigars off the dollar bills of our productivity, laughing at us all.
lighting their cigars off the **hundred** dollar bills of our productivity,
Haha I almost wrote 100 dollar bills but got lazy
Actually, the fascist-democrats have no method of measuring the intensity or the direction of political acts, so anything goes for them.
Years ago I developed a model that involves both the intensity and direction, but did not cover it in this letter. When they call the right wingers extreme, from what point is that intensity measured? How is it extreme? They are just throwing out words.
Go to ourconstitution dot us and you can download the pdf that explains it. Please let me know your opinion on the model.
ping
ping
Excellent post.
Its not about intensity here - its about origins of the words used and the ability to falsely label others. Words mean things and the Dems co-opted the language while the GOPers slept or were diverted by internal squabbles. So the GOP lost the language battle they did not know they were engaged in - naive lot.
Not interested thank you for the invite - I have too many other demands at the moment.
It is to a certain extent the inevitable outgrowth of progressives hijacking the word “liberal”, to use as camouflage, in the 1930s.
And our allowing it. This has to change within our group first.
I’m all in on reclaiming the word “liberal” for its rightful owners. The progeny of Wilson and the Roosevelts, they’re progressives - they’re not liberals. However, I don’t see this happening any time soon.
Liberal, progressive and such are not points worth arguing.
But returning the Constitution as the initial point in all political measurements will have a good effect in our education system. It identifies all the educators as a fringe element, not centrists.
I’ve been using this tactic for years. It works. I had a NPR reporter stammering when I argued using this point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.