Posted on 04/22/2020 11:27:50 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Graduated from HS in 1961.
Mine were class of ‘65.
Poo! Nothing but mere sprouts.
Poll details are here:
- see http://www.apnorc.org/projects/Pages/Is-America-Ready-to-Re-Open-.aspx
- see http://www.apnorc.org/projects/Documents/4_22_20_govt_topline.pdf
Again no question as to the following:
1) Were people unemployed or on reduced hours as a result go COVID-19?
2) Had people’s income decreased / increased / stayed the same as a result of COVID-19?
Those two questions would seem to be highly relevant? Why? Because it’s probably easier to say stay at home if you’ve had no decrease in income.
Are you for real?? Who are the people you believe to be too clueless to understand the costs of this draconian shut down?? Do they need their hand held and have it all spelled out by the President?
Sorry, if someone is too dense to understand, the last thing I want our President to put on his to-do list is help the dimwits. I’m so baffled by your comment.
There are those we aren’t effected, by circumstances yet clearly understand the situation. Then there are those who feign ignorance, I don’t waste any effort on them.
Well they may have asked those but some of them are receiving money while being out of work and in some cases more money than they made while they were working. So they will want the quarantine to continue for that reason.
I bet if they polled people who made in the six figures who no longer have a job they would want to open faster because they will be making less on the unemployment even with he extra 600 added.
A lot of people are not aware, that’s why polls have the results they have. Not everyone is on FR. If you want a consensus so that we open up before too many more lives are destroyed, people need to be educated. Good politicians shape opinions. It’s not enough to convince us on FR.
Thanks. It also stems from a couple other facts. I work in a small group that includes two guys. 1) 53 year old with a high school senior, going to college next year; and 2) a 56 year old Iraqi war I vet, with three kids. One already in college (freshman) and two in late high school (Sophomore and senior). Even though I was the one that started the office, and have been there for 19 1/2 years, I told the Chairman of the Board that if someone needed to sit on the bench for awhile, sit me. I couldn't live with myself if one of the others got benched, and I didn't.
Don’t know your faith but that is real Christian charity.
I have the suspicion there is a lot of that going on. We don’t see the huge majority of it; true charity is usually not ostentatious.
God sees.
It is the most important right.
“The media is tapping into female fears. Women are driving the panic and the sense that we must err on the side of lockdown. It feeds into their protective, risk-averse nature. They aren’t being convinced that economic ruin is far worse long-term for their children — a message that doesn’t resonate with a group which is more geared toward current, not future, perceived risks.”
Absolutely correct!
We live in a matriarchy. A Nanny State.
How about United States citizens, instead?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.