Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

In reality, in a conflict between the executive and legislative branches, the Courts are supposed to decide. If the alleged urgency to protect the 2020 election had any merit, the Courts would provide an expedited ruling, and the House could have had their witnesses if their demand had legal merit. The truth is this is all a cynical campaign ad for the November election, and the democrats are hoping their impeachment charade will do more to motivate their base than it does to alienate swing voters. Considering that they were going to lose in November, they might as well try this Hail Mary.


11 posted on 01/24/2020 8:17:22 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

If the Chief Justice is currently presiding, my guess is he could, and would, expedite any appeal to the full Supreme Court.


13 posted on 01/24/2020 8:19:08 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Pollster1

I think there is a huge danger in letting Federal courts get involved in a dispute that relates to a process like impeachment that is explicitly laid out in the Constitution in terms of executive and legislative branch functions.


20 posted on 01/24/2020 8:29:40 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson