Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Momentum grows for dropping 'President' from title of China's leader; Remove 'veneer' of...
The Washington Times ^ | hursday, November 28, 2019 | Ben Wolfgang

Posted on 11/29/2019 8:46:45 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

FULL TITLE: Momentum grows for dropping 'President' from title of China's leader; Remove 'veneer' of legitimacy

The Trump administration, with a simple change in rhetoric, has signaled a subtle shift in its approach to China in recent weeks — and in the process has deepened a rift with the Communist Party leadership in Beijing.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a major foreign policy speech late last month in which he referred to Chinese leader Xi Jinping as “general secretary” rather than “president.” The seemingly minor tweak, national security sources and analysts say, carries a much deeper meaning and suggests China hawks in the administration are employing unprecedented bluntness in calling out the lack of democracy and free elections in China.

The policy does not appear to have spread throughout the administration. President Trump referred to “President Xi” when speaking to reporters Tuesday in the Oval Office about the prospects of a trade deal. But sources see growing momentum in Washington to describe the Chinese leader as someone not bound by the will of his people or other democratic checks and balances.

China’s leader technically wears multiple hats. Mr. Xi, 66, is general secretary of the Communist Party of China; president of the People’s Republic of China, a largely ceremonial position making him head of state in protocol terms; and chairman of the powerful Central Military Commission. As part of a concerted drive to cement his power and extend his term, Mr. Xi also secured the title of “core leader” from the Communist Party three years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; jinping; kag; maga; mikepompeo; pompeo; trump; xijinping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 11/29/2019 8:46:45 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This will undoubtedly be very confusing for Michael Bloomberg, who apparently still thinks the Chinese leader is accountable to the Chinese people.


2 posted on 11/29/2019 8:54:49 PM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

At least Pompeo is standing firm. I discovered a quote from FDR days about his squishy State Dept: “There is an increasing demand that the president and Secretary Hull get rid of the unteachable group in the State Department of men who have not learned, after ten years of experience, that appeasement has never worked anywhere, at any time. Elmer Davis


3 posted on 11/29/2019 8:55:32 PM PST by Tucker39 ("It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Speaker of the House Xi?
4 posted on 11/29/2019 8:56:22 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Who's the leader of the club that feeds on dead babies? M-O-L... O-C-H... M-O-U-S-E.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Chinese communists hate being called what they truly are, as are all communists. “President” implies or at least gives a connotation that he was elected, which he was not. Just tell the truth, don’t embellish it for their sake. Good for you Pompeo.


5 posted on 11/29/2019 9:01:24 PM PST by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Everyone calls Kim in North Korea, Chairman Kim, as he’s chairman of the communist party. Chairman Mao was the chairman of the Chinese communists in his era.

Call a spade a spade.

Perhaps the Chinese would claim they have free and fair elections, and that president Xi was freely elected. In any case we know the communist party is in charge .


6 posted on 11/29/2019 9:06:22 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi
Chinese communists hate being called what they truly are, as are all communists. “President” implies or at least gives a connotation that he was elected, which he was not. Just tell the truth, don’t embellish it for their sake. Good for you Pompeo.


Nixon's "ping pong" diplomacy was done from weakness and inflicted long lasting damage to the industrial strength of America. I am not against the Chinese strengthening their industry, but I am not for America unilaterally de-industrializing. Meanwhile, the media with Tom Brokaw were cheerleaders for the wonderful "information age" or the "post industrial society". Never made any sense.
7 posted on 11/29/2019 9:19:12 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Please, oh pretty please let Crazy Uncle Joe Biden be the nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

And that is what Nixon is most praised for.

Figures.


8 posted on 11/29/2019 9:24:28 PM PST by dp0622 (Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

Right now I’m reading Hornfishcer’s book ‘Neptune’s Inferno’ about the Navy’s role in the battle of Guadalcanal. Early in the book he refers to FDRs using a personal envoy to Britain to bypass Ambassador Kennedy. Obviously an impeachable offense had Congress known...


9 posted on 11/29/2019 9:25:39 PM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why not just call him a dictator?


10 posted on 11/29/2019 9:35:52 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

What? Self Appointed Emperor for Life wasn’t available as a title?


11 posted on 11/29/2019 9:44:38 PM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

“And that is what Nixon is most praised for.”

Nixon was playing with a bust hand after extracting the US from Vietnam. Opening China was ugly balance of power politics but probably necessary to offset what at that time looked like an ascendant Soviet Union. It was like arming the Taliban against the Soviets. A least worst alternative that we have paid for dearly.


12 posted on 11/29/2019 10:05:18 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
And that is what Nixon is most praised for.

Figures.


Guess who was doing the praising: the media. Who were the beneficiaries? The globalists, lobbyists, including ex congress critters. Nice scheme while it lasts. Fortunately, those days are over.
13 posted on 11/29/2019 10:24:41 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Please, oh pretty please let Crazy Uncle Joe Biden be the nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

Bloomberg said really nice things about Xi Jinping in order to protect his company’s fast-growing Chinese revenues which, at $24,000 per terminal per year and 5,500 Chinese terminals, are easily worth over $100m a year. Did he really mean Xi Jinping wasn’t a dictator? Probably not. Many would have switched subjects. But he also needed to protect his Chinese reporters and access to Chinese news stories. Since then, Bloomberg LP has come out with many negative (and positive) news stories about China. That’s the function of a business news provider - to provide an overall view so investors understand the big economic picture. But he hasn’t gone after Xi directly.


14 posted on 11/29/2019 10:40:35 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And stop calling it the PRC. It’s Red China.


15 posted on 11/29/2019 11:00:45 PM PST by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
I refer to them as the Chinese Communist or Communist China. I refer to Taiwan as Formosa.
16 posted on 11/29/2019 11:04:10 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In his latest book, “Trump vs. China”, Newt Gingrich strongly recommends that our leaders call Xi Secretary General, rather than President. Apparently our Secretary of State decided to follow his advice.


17 posted on 11/30/2019 12:22:08 AM PST by James Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

“ Speaker of the House Xi?”

(DNC) Chairman.


18 posted on 11/30/2019 2:20:01 AM PST by ScottinVA (Out of Virginia in 2021.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

New executive order needed. No trade with communist nations ever. Shut it down. We will be much better off if we don’t trade with china at all.


19 posted on 11/30/2019 3:22:49 AM PST by cdpap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bump


20 posted on 11/30/2019 3:49:57 AM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson