[canuck_conservative]

He posed for a picture with a dead Islamic terrorist.

But if you check, I’ll bet that regulation was only enacted about 2003, just after 9-11 and when Bush was so insistent about not inflaming Muslims

[ROCKLOBSTER]

when Bush was so insistent about not inflaming Muslims

Inflame them....then light them up.

[shelterguy]

“”””””But if you check, I’ll bet that regulation was only enacted about 2003, just after 9-11 and when Bush was so insistent about not inflaming Muslims”

Some people did some things.

[AppyPappy]

The meme going around FB is that he killed a “wounded civilian”(terrorist).

[A_Former_Democrat]

“Celebrate Mortality!”

[pfflier]

I think it is actually part of the Geneva Conventions.

However considering how the ragheads treated our dead in the Black Hawk Down incident and the contractors on the bridge, I would say, in perspective, Gallaghers violation is a "technical foul" worthy of a letter of reprimand or an Article 15 at most.

[V V Camp Enari 67-68]

Yep, that’s what I can’t figure. What’s the big deal about anyway? It’s a terrorist that’s no longer functional. I don’t see any problem, but that’s just me.

[AF_Blue]

IIRC, he was one of a group that posed for the photo, but Chief G was the only one prosecuted for it.