[Williams]

EVERY one of their witnesses has said Ukraine is absolutely corrupt. They just complained that Trump called Ukraine corrupt.

And omg Trump met with Putin and that wasn’t good for Ukraine!

Really?? How do these so called experts know that Trump meeting with Putin is not in Ukraine’s interests, when Trump is selling Ukraine offensive weaponry to fight Russia and it is most likely Trump told Putin to stay the hell out of of Ukraine. Wasn’t that and outrageous and unprofessional statement by this so called diplomat?

[snippy_about_it]

The only diplomat that appeared to be professional in all these hearings was Ambassador Volker. He understood the President’s issues and did not have a problem working with Rudy and others to work them out to the positive conclusion that was met, aid to Ukraine and the President coming around to believing in the Ukraine’s new leadership.

[caww]

The problem is the 'career bureaucrats' (big governvent leaning) want to control every aspect of Ukraine and how our president should conduct US policy toward Ukraine as though our President cannot establish his own relationships with Country leaders.

[Moonlighter]

My thoughts exactly. Holmes wasn’t present nor in the loop for any Trump/Putin meeting, he has no way of knowing if it was good, bad or neutral regarding Ukraine. He is making an assumption based on what is being said by other ignorants and/or what he wants to believe, which is the theme of this entire inquiry.