Posted on 11/19/2019 6:46:57 AM PST by CWW
No rules, just the whims of the chairman.
>He doesn’t know who the whistle blower is and neither does Schitt or CNN. Just ask them.
Yeah, if only Vindman blurted out Ciaramella but he’s shaking like a leaf. He’s clearly the guilty one. Williams, on the other hand, it completely unfazed.
I cannot believe this @$$hat took an oath of loyalty to the USA. I wonder if he took it in Russian, Ukranian or English
Get off your high horse. It's one thing to criticize someone's post but you are in no position to control another man's speech.
I'm a veteran. No one here has denigrated THE uniform, just HIS uniform. It is being worn not in respect but in defiance of his commander in chief and oath of office. The only one disrespecting the uniform is Vindman and I'm proud of my fellow FReepers for calling him out on it.
That’s true, and Vindman should have appeared in civilian clothes, his usual dress at the NSC. His appearance in uniform is clearly a part of the Democrat Party to advance a certain narrative. He is a willing participant in this charade and is demonstrating his political allegiances. My point is to insult Vindman and not the Army uniform that he is wearing.
I’m sure that they’ll follow up during questioning.
They already have holes in Vindman’s testimony. It’s just a matter of time.
“I don’t know much about Hunter Biden” ?
Wow? Sure. As far as I am concerned that
is an admittance the so called investigation is a
colossal fraud!
Then quit insulting people wearing the uniform
Then quit insulting people wearing the uniform
Is anybody watching vindman’s lawyer? He looks more nervous than Vindman. If his client doesn’t follow the script he, the lawyer, might have his ass in a sling too.
Lawyers who become politicians often do so because they suck at the practice of law. An experienced and competent trial lawyer would structure the Q & A along the lines that you suggest. In all fairness, however, an effective cross-examination takes time to develop, and 5 minutes, 30 minutes, and even 60 minutes may not be enough time to score points.
Good. Nail the guy!
Please give it a rest.
It also helps to be allowed to challenge an answer in real time, not an hour later.
Pretty clear now that LTC Vindman was the source for the Whistle-blower ...which would be a crime. Plus the LTC previously testified on oath that he didn’t know who the whistle-blower was.
Schiff rule: You can talk about it so long as it doesn’t reveal what a partisan coup this is under my guise.
This guy thinks taking the picture was cool. You take the picture if you are the least important person in the group.
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1196820957144526849
Rep. Jim Jordan
Verified account
@Jim_Jordan
45s45 seconds ago
Lt. Col. Vindman has repeatedly claimed that the President “demanded” investigations on the July 25th call.
We’ve all read the transcript of the call. There was no demand, no mention of aid, no quid pro quo.
(video clip at link)
WOW. A good interigater would have a field day with this guy.
Just have Nunes put a PRC 25 up on his desktop. Tell him he has an incoming call.
Could almost anyone claim to be the whistleblower...and they think they have inside info..?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.