Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucson, Arizona voters overwhelmingly reject sanctuary city measure
Associated Press ^ | 11/06/2019

Posted on 11/06/2019 8:02:58 AM PST by SeekAndFind

TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) — Voters in one of Arizona’s most liberal cities rejected an initiative Tuesday that would have made Tucson the state’s only sanctuary city amid concerns that it went too far in restricting police officers.

The measure drew fierce opposition from the mayor and city council, all of them Democrats, who said the initiative risked public safety and millions of dollars the city gets from the state and federal governments.

The measure was pushed by activists who wanted to give a voice to Tucson’s Latino community. They said it would have sent the message that immigrants are safe and protected in Tucson at a time when many are fearful of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.

The initiative, known as Proposition 205, would have put new restrictions on when police can inquire about immigration status or cooperate with federal law enforcement.

It explicitly aims to neuter a 2010 Arizona immigration law known as SB1070, which drew mass protests and a boycott of the state. It prohibits sanctuary cities in Arizona and requires police, when enforcing other laws, to verify the immigration status of anyone suspected of being in the country illegally. Courts threw out much of the law but upheld the requirement for officers to check immigration papers.

“It will put into law that we will not, as we move forward, collaborate in the federal effort to terrorize, detain, separate and deport our community members,” said Zaira Livier, executive director of the People’s Defense Initiative, which organized the effort that became Proposition 205.

Tucson’s mayor and city council members, all of them Democrats, were opposed to the measure because they worried about unintended consequences and the potential for losing millions of dollars in state and federal funding.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; illegals; postedseveraltimes; sanctuarycity; seebreakingnews; tucson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Just keep having a vote on it every year until one year it passes. The announce it settled and never allow another vote again


21 posted on 11/06/2019 8:34:09 AM PST by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

Don’t get your hopes up either. The idiots in Tucson elected a Mexican woman mayor who’s ultra liberal and in favor of sanctuary cities.

Watch for a similar proposition to come back in the next election. The Rats never give up.


22 posted on 11/06/2019 8:48:25 AM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Has anyone in the MSM come out yet to label these Tucson voters as racists?


23 posted on 11/06/2019 8:51:15 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

24 posted on 11/06/2019 8:55:31 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet
Don’t give up folks. There is still a ray of sunshine left in this country.

If they closed the damned Universities Arizona would instantly go RED!

25 posted on 11/06/2019 8:56:15 AM PST by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
71.4%, voted “no” on the proposal compared to just 23,562, or 29%, who voted “yes.”

Big numbers...Very encouraging.

26 posted on 11/06/2019 8:57:47 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wow for a somewhat liberal city, they got their liberal A$$es kicked:

58,820 voters, or 71.4%, voted “no” on the proposal compared to just 23,562, or 29%, who voted “yes.”


27 posted on 11/06/2019 9:17:17 AM PST by Grampa Dave (If we have a civil war, the winners will be our enemies: Iran, China, Russia, Mexico, & Deep State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

28 posted on 11/06/2019 9:25:59 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The measure was pushed by activists who wanted to give a voice to Tucson’s Latino Illegal community. They said it would have sent the message that immigrants lawbreakers are safe and protected in Tucson at a time when many are fearful of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.
There, fixed it.
29 posted on 11/06/2019 9:30:44 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Hillary Clinton: Just like Joe with only half the dementia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson