Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: norwaypinesavage

Where? Can you please post a link? Thanks.


62 posted on 10/26/2019 7:32:49 AM PDT by mwilli20 (DJT, let's MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: All
HAT TIP-----FREEPER BRATCH'S EXCELLENT RESEARCH-----FYI

Currently the Legislative Branch is expressing their “impeachment authority” as part of the Legislative Branch purpose.
That raises the issue of an entirely different type of subpoena:
A demand from congress that penetrates the constitutional separation of powers.
It further penetrates the legal authority of Executive Branch executive privilege.

======================================

POINTS TO PONDER
It was separately established by SCOTUS during the Nixon impeachment investigation that
*IF* the full House votes to have the Judiciary Committee commence an impeachment investigation,
then the Judiciary Committee has subpoena power that can overcome executive privilege claims.

<><> There has been NO VOTE to create that level of subpoena power.
<><> ergo, the House has not created a process to penetrate the constitutionally inherent separation of powers,
<><> nor the legally recognized firewall known as ‘executive privilege’.
<><> a House vote authorizes the committee impeachment investigation,
<><> only then does the committee gains judicial enforcement authority.
<><> thus creating the penalty for non-compliance with an impeachment subpoena.

======================================

A demand letter only becomes a “subpoena” (technically ‘a request for the production of documents with a penalty for non-compliance’) when the committee has judicial enforcement authority.

Only then does that process establish an enforcement penalty.

The current demand letters cannot carry a penalty because the demands do not contain judicial enforcement authority....simply because the impeachment investigation was not authorized by the chamber.

The reason judicial enforcement authority is constitutionally required is because creating Judicial enforcement authority, creating the penalty for non-compliance, gives the Executive Branch a process to appeal any legislative demand via the Judicial Branch (federal courts).

Absent a penalty for non-compliance, which factually makes a subpoena a ‘subpoena’, the Executive Branch has no process to engage an appellate review by federal courts.

This, then, is the purposeful trick within the Pelosi/Lawfare road-map.

65 posted on 10/26/2019 7:36:45 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: mwilli20

Google is your friend (once and a while): rushlimbaugh.com


107 posted on 10/26/2019 9:51:41 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson