[Libloather]

On the bright side, it's free.

[SkyDancer]

With a 10,000$ deductible.

[Brilliant]

No problemo. The middle class can pay that.

[Pontiac]

Sanders are pushing would require $34 trillion in additional federal spending over its first decade in operation. That’s more than the federal government’s total cost over the coming decade for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid combined, according to the most recent Congressional Budget Office projections.

When you consider that CBO estimates are as a rule at least 30% lower than actual figures those are some pretty scary numbers.

[TomGuy]

$34 Trillion.

If Warren or the other Lib/Socialists taxed the wealth of the top 100 in America at 100%, they would get just over $1 Trillion. Then what? That ‘wealth’ would be gone and Warren would still need $33 Trillion.

These socialists are so out of touch with reality that it is scary because they have so much public support.

[Montaignes Cat]

It would be a golden goose for those able to position themselves to collect the eggs. Currently health care is about 20% of GDP.

[ETCM]

$34,000,000,000,000.00!

That’s over $100,000 for every man, woman and child in the USA. Over $10,000/year for every person. Over $40,000/year for a family of 4! Of course, just as with taxes, the bottom 40%-50% will pay nothing. So, if you are a tax payer, double that price and bend over...

[neverevergiveup]

That she is a ‘Professor of Law’ at Harvard tells you everything you need to know about how laughable the Ivy League superiority argument is.

[WWG1WWA]

Why is our side allowing them to get away with this? Medicare is NOT welfare for seniors. It’s a TRUST. Workers pay into that Trust with every single paycheck their entire lives. Medicare is for workers, not lay-abouts. That they allow Democrats to get away with this without comment is wrong! Stand the heck up, so called leaders.

[Jim Robinson]

Thirty trillion here, thirty trillion there, and pretty soon we’re talking real money.

[preacher]

l8r