Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2019 12:48:13 PM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: janetjanet998

[T]he defendant’s filings—although captioned as a motion to compel production of Brady material—are in fact an effort by the defendant to have his case dismissed. Since the beginning of their involvement, the defendant’s new counsel have sought to get the charges dropped, professed their client’s actual innocence, and perpetuated conspiracy theories, all while stating that the defendant does not intend to withdraw his guilty plea. Certainly, true and credible Brady violations in a case could justify sanctions and other remedies, to include dismissal. In this case, however, nothing could be further from the truth.


2 posted on 10/01/2019 12:49:09 PM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

We are no longer a nation of laws...


3 posted on 10/01/2019 12:51:18 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Ruth Bader Ginsburg doctor is a taxidermist. Pop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Conspiracy theories become conspiracy fact with evidence.


4 posted on 10/01/2019 12:51:41 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Not sure Judge Sullivan will buy this. Feds are stonewalling and Gen. Flynn’s new counsel, Sidney Powell has identified documents that currently exist.

It’s creating a problem the judge will need to decide. I think he will press the metal one more time and demand the Feds cough it up. If not, bye-bye sentencing.

That’s my hope. I don’t know how the judge views the current status of the case.


5 posted on 10/01/2019 12:52:10 PM PDT by romanesq (8Chan and its child porn, violence and murders are kaput. So is the QAnon grift with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998
A duly elected president should be able to stop his underlings at the DOJ and end this nonsense.

This is the kind of crap that you get when you have a rogue department in the executive branch.

9 posted on 10/01/2019 12:55:02 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

If you think about it, Brady (eg; exculpatory) material is generally going to look like it has no bearing; it has bearing only upon comparative examination.

Flynn’s answer should be: “what...you runnin’ out of money to pursue your case or something?”


11 posted on 10/01/2019 12:56:32 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Most troubling is that the term conspiracy theory is the Democrat talking point for this month. The prosecutors affinity for Democrat politics is showing.


15 posted on 10/01/2019 12:59:34 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Did the turn over the text message from McCabe that said, first we f**k Flynn and then we f**k Trump?

That seem relevant.


16 posted on 10/01/2019 12:59:37 PM PDT by Gahanna Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Those requests must have really hit a raw nerve!

Way to go Flynn legal team.


17 posted on 10/01/2019 1:00:59 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Different story here:

New Evidence Suggests Prosecutors Pressured Michael Flynn To Lie

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/01/new-evidence-suggests-prosecutors-pressured-michael-flynn-to-lie/


18 posted on 10/01/2019 1:01:21 PM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

So prove your claim he’s lying, release the documents. Oh, you don’t want to? Then we don’t have to believe you. (not you Janet, the feds).


20 posted on 10/01/2019 1:06:14 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Outrageous. Brady material is ALWAYS pertinent


23 posted on 10/01/2019 1:10:41 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998
Please read Licensed To Lie by Sidney Powell for an in-dept exposé of previous Brady Law abuses!
26 posted on 10/01/2019 1:24:59 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (The Elite: Too stupid to know when to quit stealing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

WINNING!!! TRUST THE PLAN YOU STUPID SHEEP!!!


27 posted on 10/01/2019 1:27:09 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998
Like they say, when you're drawing flak, you're over target.
 
28 posted on 10/01/2019 1:31:12 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (Everything I Needed to Know About Islam I Learned on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

So “Brady” evidence is now a “sideshow”. This contention alone shows how corrupt the Left is.


29 posted on 10/01/2019 1:37:38 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

If they will have NO impact RELEASE them already. What is the harm?

These prosecutors “Protest too much”.


30 posted on 10/01/2019 1:38:17 PM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

The prosecutors politicizing of case should be a red flag to any judge that this is exactly what it seems; a political prosecution.


38 posted on 10/01/2019 2:02:34 PM PDT by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998
Dear Prosecutor,

Produce or shut up!

39 posted on 10/01/2019 2:03:38 PM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998
Not exactly a compelling legal argument
42 posted on 10/01/2019 2:13:02 PM PDT by rdcbn ( Referentia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson