Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

>>The Supreme Court should hold that the federal statute which prohibits employment discrimination “because of sex” prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and against transgender individuals.

That erroneous interpretation of law would be like protecting people in blackface or who have tattoos because of prohibited discrimination based on “skin color”.


9 posted on 09/23/2019 6:18:21 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

Also, if “because of sex” covers those things, then why shouldn’t it cover pedophilia as well?

We can’t stop kiddie diddlers from working as school teachers, that would be discrimination “because of sex”.


44 posted on 09/23/2019 8:17:43 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson