[CitizenUSA]

I see you get it, fwdude. Posters in this thread are discussing if LGBT employment should be covered by the CRA when they should be questioning why the CRA is legal in the first place. They are starting from a faulty premise, that government has the right to force someone to employ people they have fundamental disagreements with, simply because the first person wants to open a business.

Granted, it’s pretty stupid to discriminate against customers on the basis of skin color, but employment goes way beyond just being a customer. Employees can be almost as close as family in some businesses. Government needs to keep its nose out!

[fwdude]

When so-called “conservatives” take the decidedly defensive position of conceding that “civil rights” protections are legitimate, but don’t include sexual deviants, they are using a losing strategy. The homo-left sees this and laughs. They know that it has no teeth to combat them.