Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman
I think these results are probably accurate. A lot can change between now and election day, but Trump's chances of winning depend on his ability to demolish his Democrat opponent, or on said dem self-demolishing through sheer lunacy. Both are possible, but as of today, against a generic dem, Trump would lose.

The truth is, Hillary Clinton was probably the worst Democratic candidate in history, for reasons about which most here would agree. To do worse than Hillary, the dems would have had to run Freddie Kreuger for president and Michael Myers for Vice. (As they're the party of abortion absolutists, they might be tempted to do this.) Even Hillary was able to win the popular vote, and she lost only because she ran a terrible campaign and forgot about the electoral college. Trump's victory was made possible by a few tens of thousands of votes in three or four unexpected takeaway states that cracked the "blue wall."

The Democrats are hyper energized by sheer hate. That may backfire once voters realize that the hate is now unhinged, and its targets extend far beyond Donald Trump. But that's a heckuva thing for us to be counting on.

98 posted on 08/29/2019 10:28:33 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sphinx
The Democrats are hyper energized by sheer hate.

You are right about that with respect to committed Democrats. But I think that an argument that will resound with Independents is,

"Do you really want to give the power of government to people consumed by hate?"

102 posted on 08/29/2019 10:38:49 AM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson