To: Ancesthntr
If the VP went back to DC. And the president is there, it cannot be an imminent attack. They would be required to be in separate locations for such an attack. One would think.
250 posted on
07/02/2019 9:56:36 AM PDT by
justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
To: justa-hairyape
Depends on the target, I would think.
If there is a target, might not be us.
254 posted on
07/02/2019 9:57:31 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds,)
To: justa-hairyape
If there were some kind of major emergency then I sure that they would not give the actual locations of either the president or the vice president. They would leak false locations.
265 posted on
07/02/2019 10:00:02 AM PDT by
Revel
To: justa-hairyape
If the VP went back to DC. And the president is there, it cannot be an imminent attack. They would be required to be in separate locations for such an attack. One would think.Logical. So what would bring Pence back? And alert the EU and Russians?
270 posted on
07/02/2019 10:01:24 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Democrats "a party that makes. Americans feel like strangers in their own country. NYT)
To: justa-hairyape
“If the VP went back to DC. And the president is there, it cannot be an imminent attack. They would be required to be in separate locations for such an attack. One would think.”
Didn’t say it was an attack upon us, but that we might be getting ready to hit Iran.
430 posted on
07/02/2019 11:46:01 AM PDT by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson