Posted on 06/06/2019 5:03:41 AM PDT by robowombat
Fitzgerald CO: Destroyer Repairs at Risk from Poor Shipyard Fire Safety
By: Ben Werner May 31, 2019 3:08 PM • Updated: May 31, 2019 7:36 PM
This post has been updated with a statement from Huntington Ingalls Industries.
Poor fire safety practices in the yard are putting at risk the two-year, $523-million effort to repair USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62), the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer heavily damaged in a deadly 2017 collision, warns the ship’s commanding officer.
Cmdr. Garrett Miller, commanding officer of Fitzgerald, noted a series of more than 15 fire safety incidents aboard the ship since it arrived at the Ingalls Shipbuilding yard in Pascagoula, Miss., nearly 18 months ago. Fitzgerald was heavily damaged on June 17, 2017, when it collided with ACX Crystal off the coast of Japan, killing seven sailors in what was the first of two deadly DDG collisions with commercial ships that summer.
“The lack of fire safety is a major concern on this project and I am extremely concerned we are on a path to have a catastrophic fire event on board. NSA (Naval Supervisory Authority) and KTR (contractor) leadership have taken measures to curtail, but they have been marginally effective. I have seen improvements in government [oversight] in the past few months, but little change in craft deck plate compliance. The most recent incident is uncomfortably similar to the recent USS Oscar Austin industrial fire,” Miller writes in a May status report submitted to Navy officials earlier this month and obtained by USNI News.
USS Oscar Austin (DDG-79), which Miller refers to, is another destroyer being worked on at the BAE Systems Norfolk Ship Repair yard in Virginia. It was nearing the end of a year-long upgrade period when a fire broke out on Nov. 10, causing significant damage.
The Navy initially awarded BAE $41.6 million to upgrade Oscar Austin, and other modernization options could have increased the value of the contract to $117.1 million, according to the Navy.
The Navy has yet to identify a cause of the fire or how much repairs will cost. The Navy did recently award Raytheon $16.8 million to repair Oscar Austin’s electronics damaged by the fire.
During the most recent incident aboard Fitzgerald, which Miller says is similar to what happened on Oscar Austin, yard workers expanded their hot work into a space with no fire watch, according to his report. Hot work in the yard usually involves welding but could include using a blow torch or other heated equipment. Expanding the hot work area, Miller wrote, “caused damage to bulkhead lagging and electrical panel which will likely require replacement.”
In a Friday statement, Huntington Ingalls Industries stressed the yard is taking measures to keep work on the ship safe.
“Safety is and always will be the number one priority at Ingalls Shipbuilding. We have strict procedures and guidance relative to fire prevention and protection on every single ship built or repaired at our facility. These types of incidents happen in an industrial environment where, on this ship alone, approximately 23,000 hot work items have been conducted over an 18-month period,” read the statement provided following an earlier version of this post.
“Regardless, our goal remains zero incidents on all our ships. We knew and were prepared for the challenging work associated with an extensive repair project on USS Fitzgerald, and to that end, assigned double the number of trained and qualified fire and safety personnel to the ship. Additionally, twice a day an Ingalls safety representative conducts a fire prevention and housekeeping walk through on the ship with our Navy customer.”
Colleen O’Rourke, a NAVSEA spokeswoman, did not provide any information about the status of repair work on either Fitzgerald or Oscar Austin, including the scope of the work on Oscar Austin and how much money taxpayers are paying to repair the fire damage.
The numerous fire incidents aboard Fitzgerald while in the yard involve poorly staffed fire watches, a smoldering deck, combustible material catching on fire, the discovery of previously unreported burnt-cable spot fires and fires that melted equipment, Miller writes. Since March, no hot work has been allowed to start unless an Ingalls Shipbuilding fire marshal first signs off on the work
The Naval Supervisory Authority included comments in Miller’s report concurring with his assessment. Ingalls Shipbuilding hired more fire marshals to review hot work areas, and the “new process has resulted in a slight improvement of compliance, however, the recent incident that occurred on 01MAY19 indicates deck plate supervision and training may still be deficient,” the authority writes in the report.
The bottom line, Miller states, is, “the management control processes in place have been ineffective at the deck plate level. (Naval Supervisory Authority) must take significantly more aggressive and punitive actions to force (contractor) leadership to take fire safety seriously.”
The following is Miller’s summary of fire safety events aboard USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62) since the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer entered the Ingalls Shipbuilding yard in January 2018.
24FEB18, smoldering deck due to work scope moved beyond fire watch area of responsibility without communicating to fire watch (corrective action request issued).
21MAR18, fire from grinding work in JP-5 tank sparking residual fuel resulting in small fire which was extinguished by fire watch (corrective action request issued).
27MAR18, fire from burning slag falling on improperly run oxygen and acetylene lines during removal of damaged starboard array frame causing fireball which was extinguished by fire watch (corrective action request issued).
24JUL18, fire from combustibles due to improperly cleared hot work site. Fire watch extinguished fire with agent (corrective action request issued).
27SEP18 to 02OCT18 multiple instances of improper hot work practices and discovery of burned cables with no report. (corrective action request issued/ ship-wide hot work stand-down implemented).
27NOV18: fire from combustibles due to improperly cleared hot work site. Fire watch extinguished fire with agent (corrective action request issued).
07DEC18: burn-through from welding on transverse bulkhead with no fire watch present. Craft modified job without approval from supervisor violating conditions of hot work chit. S/F Fire Marshal discovered burn-through, stopped hot work and informed Ingalls Fire Marshal (corrective action request issued/ ship-wide hot work stand-down implemented).
18DEC18: hot work commenced without fire watch on station. SSGC member discovered incorrect workspace management and reported to Ingalls Fire Marshal. Work stopped (car issued).
13FEB19: hot work commenced for overhead of intake for GTM 1b without fire watch on station. Herculite tarp on deck melted. Work stopped (corrective action request issued).
19FEB19: hot work commenced with fire watch stationed in wrong space. Ships force rover saw bubbling paint and flames and contacted Ingalls watch and extinguished.
28FEB19: hot work commenced without adequate fire watch on station inside mast for welding of new antenna platform. Cables not protected and paint not ground down. Work stopped.
01MAR19: hot work in progress without fire watch stationed. Hot work site shut down by SSGC and Fire Marshal notified. Additionally SSGC shut down all hot work onboard, requested safety standdown and implemented policy that hot work will not commence without HII Fire Marshal signature on chit prior to start of hot work. Supervisors no longer qualified to approve the start of hot work.
07MAR19: hot work commenced without fire watch on station. Discovered by NSA personnel. Job shut down and supervisor disciplined.
14MAR19: hot work in progress without fire watch. Fire watch had left and thought another was covering. (ship-wide hot work shut down for three days. corrective action request issued)
01MAY19: hot work in progress with fire watches stationed as indicated on chit, but trade expanded hot work into a space with no fire watch which caused damage to bulkhead lagging and electrical panel which will likely require replacement (hot work stopped and critique in progress).
I don’t care if they’re Amish, Chinese, or a bunch of Norwegians, if you can’t penalize and possibly fire those who break the rules you’re going to get the same result.
It's fine to say something is, "corporately impossible" but that's just another way of saying the corporations have become experts at socializing costs and privatizing profits.
So, single out whatever group you feel is most entitlement oriented or single out the fact that corporations will spend millions lobbying for something like more H1B Visas while hundreds of thousands of qualified people are still unemployed or underemployed but not one red cent to buck the costly preferences and restrictions fraudulent equal opportunity regulations create.
Choose whichever perspective you like but the fact is that the corporations themselves are the root cause of the problem.
It’s an issue for the contractor, Ingalls Shipbuilding.
If they’re trying to save money on the contract by hiring less capable or careful employees, they need to lose the contract and any funds they’ve spent on it.
The bottom line, don’t bid on the contract if you cannot follow the safety guidelines set forth by the US Navy.
I spent almost a year and a half in Ingall's Shipyard in the mid-to-late 1980s. The ethnic breakdown is about the same there--half Amish--but I don't remember any significant safety concerns. Safety, as you can imagine, is typically the top priority in such an environment.
if you can’t penalize and possibly fire those who break the rules you’re going to get the same result.
Deeper than that, IMO.
I worked in a large research lab.
Lots or welding (mostly TIG, fewer sparks), grinding, heating... Anytime the equipment was modified, can be often.
And miles of 1000 PSI Hydrogen, remember the Hindenburg?
I have seen more than a few fired on the spot!
The safety team from the director on down, female.
IMO this was a means of increasing diversity.
Only a few had experience with this line of work.
The fire watch position is mind-numbing.
NO RADIOS(MUSIC), NO TALKING, NO SMOKING, they are welding and the place is full of fumes, still no smoking!!!
Cell phones are not allowed, anything with a battery must be intrinsically safe. I had an approved company phone that cost over $2,000.
Everybody wears a large number tag and various ‘observers’
log your number if it appears you are not discussing fire safety issues. Three strikes and out, fired.
Paperwork up the wazoo!
I was written up because of my TASK SAFTY ANALISIS NOT LISTING a thorn tree about ten feet from a piece of outdoor equipment.
Every effort is made to encourage the team to remain on campus for lunch, lest the pick up the scent of a beer, or worse. Lots of free food to keep them on campus.
One of my guys was fired because the building safety person (not site safety) said he smelled of alcohol. When asked, I honestly said that I do not drink and not familiar with the smell.
He said that he had been to a late night party the previous evening.
He returned the next day with an attorney because they did not use a breathalyzer, as required. He quit the next week.
Many might think standing doing nothing is a dream job, I never found anyone that liked it.
Many will make $100,000 a year!!!
And many quit.
The site is divided by classification, ClassIII, Div1 (BAD), in lesser areas I was allowed to supervise and be fire watch. do paperwork(no computer) and observe.
That was workable, but you could NOT be a welders helper and fire watch at the same time. (paid way less)
It is my opinion that all the paperwork, rules and wasted time did not improve safety by much if at all.
And I have no answers.
Pls see #7
Have you been around this type of work?
Top down is not the answer.
Read your #7. Thorough and detailed. Good job.
So yes, I agree. Never built ships, but I was a Disaster Preparedness NCO while in the Air Force. We took it all seriously, especially along side aircraft!
That number of “single issue/single cause” ACTUAL FIRES (and explosions, and fire damage to nearby equipment) is by itself near-criminal. This number goes far past what ANY reasonable construction-industrial-power plant outage management in ANY INDUSTRY can tolerate.
If the shipyard NAVSEA controller (The person in charge of all of the naval contracts with the shipyard) did not stop this number of fires, he/she/it MUST BE FIRED.
And his/her/its boss MUST BE FIRED.
AND the people the next level up.
I spent 10 years in naval and civilian shipyards supervising construction and testing. Have spent another 15 years supervising power plant repairs and construction inside client plant sites as the contractor.
Even ONE FIRE in ONE ship is unacceptable.
When the majority of the problem people are (black|african-american|colored|people of color|whatever you want to call it these days), you have a bigger problem than just bad employees. If you fire all of the malingering, incompetent, adversarial bastards, you’ll have the EEOC and the federal courts up your nether regions. It’s called “disparate impact”. You’re presumptively guilty of racial discrimination.
Let’s hope that the new skipper will be as alert to other ship traffic and he is to fire safety, it seems that the prior skipper was unaware that there were other ship in the ocean. As ex-navy, I still find it hard to believe that this accident was allowed to happen.
That leads to just what we're seeing, they get the contracts and we all pay through the nose because they can't run their business in a way that complies with all the BS red tape, EEOC insanity, and so on.
The money they spend lobbying to get more foreigners in the H1B program or having some penalty for moving jobs overseas removed is a lot more than they'd spend fighting the crap that causes these problems and would be more beneficial in the long run.
Excellent detailed real world experience report. The number of serious fire incidents in this yard is still astounding.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.