Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Durham Needs To Investigate Why The Info Generating The Mueller Probe Is All Linked To Clinton (tr)
The Federalist ^ | 5/30/2019 | H.A. Goodman

Posted on 05/30/2019 8:37:31 AM PDT by RightGeek

At a certain point, it can’t be mere coincidence that every major figure involved in probing Trump’s campaign is linked to Hillary Clinton in some manner.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation had a budget approaching $10 billion during James Comey’s tenure as its director. Combined with budgets for the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency, these agencies cost taxpayers around $30 billion annually.

Therefore, one would think that incriminating evidence derived from the FBI, NSA, or CIA could have linked Donald Trump to Russian hackers or Kremlin operatives, if that evidence existed. Instead, almost all the major findings used to justify investigations into Trump’s campaign are linked to Hillary Clinton or the Democratic Party.

The heads of America’s top intelligence agencies used a dossier linked to Clinton’s funding, a tech firm outsourced by the Democratic National Committee, and hearsay from Alexander Downer as the basis to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants and initiate sprawling probes.

The “evidence” leading up to the Robert Mueller probe was so specious that the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence reports compiled by James Clapper and others had warranty disclaimers. President Trump was investigated based on intelligence linked to statements like “(DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within” and “judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.”

U.S. Attorney General William Barr hired prosecutor John Durham to investigate the origins of the Mueller probe. A key issue for Durham to resolve is why the inciting information never originated within the U.S. government. Why has the funding from Democrats, along with other blatant conflicts of interest, been ignored by Comey, Clapper, and John Brennan?

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; durham; mueller; muellerprobe; russiagate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Full title: "John Durham Needs To Investigate Why The Info Generating The Mueller Probe Is All Linked To Hillary Clinton".

My answer is that it is a stinking deep swamp.


1 posted on 05/30/2019 8:37:31 AM PDT by RightGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

And we sheeple had the nerve to vote him in.


2 posted on 05/30/2019 8:41:29 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

I got scared for my Country when people questioning Obama’s birth certificate were SUCCESSFULLY demonized and SILENCED.

This is going to get really f’ng ugly.


3 posted on 05/30/2019 8:44:45 AM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

bttt


4 posted on 05/30/2019 8:44:51 AM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

....AND OBAMA.


5 posted on 05/30/2019 8:47:34 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Precisely correct article— thanks for posting. Pursue it, and don’t allow Barr to stifle it or to stifle Mueller’s past criminal cop activities as the LINKING ACTIVITY of compromise-— BY the clinton crime family.


6 posted on 05/30/2019 8:47:43 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Time to investigate the investigators and their motives and methods.


7 posted on 05/30/2019 8:48:49 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

Looking back the REAL controversy should have been 0bama’s Indonesian citizenship. Interesting how “they” were able to ignore that and only be challenged on his BC.


8 posted on 05/30/2019 8:52:22 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Democrats are in a mad dash to out Trump any way they can they are in massive panic mode to protect their coup klutz clan from prison.


9 posted on 05/30/2019 8:58:56 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

BINGO!! Obama is NECK deep in this also!


10 posted on 05/30/2019 8:59:53 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
I have a 'different' take on what Mueller did yesterday. Mueller was being a good republican. (Yeah, I can hear all of you laughing). But, hear me out. Mueller set up the democrats towards a huge implosion and perhaps explosion. Thus, he's a hero to republicans. Mueller gave democrats the trigger with which to impeach Trump. Never mind that there is nothing to go after Trump with. There was no collusion and no obstruction. Mueller knows that. So, he gave the democrats a little bit of ammunition with which to go after Trump. Mueller basically said that he could not find any evidence that exonerates Trump, which is the opposite of how the law works. So, if democrats run with that as ammunition to impeach Trump, they'll be setting themselves up for major disappointments in the ballot boxes in 2020. Most thinking and reasonable people know that there was NOTHING to investigate Trump about, especially when the whole investigation was instigated by a phony anti-Trump dossier paid for by Hillary and the DNC and the Obama administration, and the corrupt FBI/CIA/DOJ.

If democrats do decide to impeach Trump, that could mean the end of their party as it existed. It would be the biggest scandal in American history, that being the attempted take-down of a president with no evidence and via a conspiracy based on a fabricated set of evidence.
11 posted on 05/30/2019 9:04:01 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

“Therefore, one would think that incriminating evidence derived from the FBI, NSA, or CIA could have linked Donald Trump to Russian hackers or Kremlin operatives, “

One would think so but with 30,000 federal agents with their feet on the desk surfing the net or playing grabass with the babe in the next cubicle it’s amazing anything of substance gets done.


12 posted on 05/30/2019 9:06:10 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Yeah, but at the same time the TV is not filled 24/7 with a couple dozen coup conspirators in orange jump suits it IS filled with delusional libtards shouting for Impeachment.


13 posted on 05/30/2019 9:07:33 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Although I wish the world worked in the Pollyannaish way of your theory about Mueller, it doesn’t. Mueller turned presumption of innocence on its head not once but twice regarding President Trump. First written into his report and then in his vicious statement yesterday. I also do not believe impeachment will hurt the Dems, but will hurt the President and, by extension, us.


14 posted on 05/30/2019 9:16:18 AM PDT by Avalon Memories (This Deplorable is not fooled by the Marxist-Stalinist totalitarians infesting the Dem Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

fbiAll the major players like Mueller and Comey etc. made rulings in one capacity or another that shielded the Clinton Crime Cartel in inquiries like Uranium 1, Foundation or the email server.

Does anyone doubt that they were well paid during all the shuffling in and out of their positions in the DOJ and FBI to private crony businesses affiliated with the Clintons. I mean how easy would it be to drop a word to Boeing that Comey would be a good guy to hire to negotiate single bidder/provider contracts with the government.

Once they are on the take, they own them forever.


15 posted on 05/30/2019 9:24:21 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Well, that and having a non-citizen parent ... where he was born shouldn’t have mattered, not even if he’d been born (before many witnesses) on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial with a choir singing the hallelujah chorus: he would still be inelligible.


16 posted on 05/30/2019 9:27:51 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: adorno

You have a lot of, IMO unjustified, faith in the character and intelligence of the American electorate.

I’d love you to be right, though.


17 posted on 05/30/2019 9:50:27 AM PDT by chesley (What is life but a long dialog with imbeciles? - Pierre Ryckmans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Going after Clinton would be a good start but only a byproduct of the greater crime of Obama’s political weaponization of the Intelligence Community. Rescuing Clinton from herself with the Russiagate op afainst Trump in 2016 was just one example, another being the IRS scandal.


18 posted on 05/30/2019 9:54:40 AM PDT by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
A key issue for Durham to resolve is why the inciting information never originated within the U.S. government. Why has the funding from Democrats, along with other blatant conflicts of interest, been ignored by Comey, Clapper, and John Brennan?

The obvious answer is that everyone involved, including Mueller, was engaged in what would be called a criminal conspiracy if they weren't at the top of the Federal government.

19 posted on 05/30/2019 9:56:14 AM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

When Liberals say there was no Spying, I think they should as Shanghai Di Fi and Angela Mohamed Merkel? If I remember correctly they were Spied on. Oh and was it James Rosen and Cheryl Atkisson?


20 posted on 05/30/2019 10:37:55 AM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson