What a ridiculous commentary
*************
Yep. The only point made is this number of pages “raises new questions” about the 4-page summary.
Except:
1) There are no questions raised in the article. Seems like that is what the article ought to contain, based on its headline and lead paragraph.
2)Apparently, the only issue is the length of the summary relative to the length of the report. There are a lot of folks involved in preparing various sections of the Mueller report that would have read the summary. If one of them were to comment that they didn’t think the summary was accurate, then the Slimes might have some news to report. They’ve gone to anonymous sources for this kind of stuff multiple times throughout Trump coverage. Seems odd that they couldn’t even find a single anonymous source to point to for this.
Nothingburger.
Good, incisive commentary.