Did you read the summary?
It’s done
No evidence of obstruction
Its over
Don’t read into it
Stop being a defeatist
We need less FR Eeyores
Barr said he and Rosenstein decided not proceed on obstruction of justice.
Mueller said he presented arguments on both sides in re: obstruction but left it up to justice on whether or not to proceed on the charge of obstruction.
Listening to some Dem jack-wagon on on the HJC on MSNBC. Said that Grand Jury testimony is not at the same threshold of “Classified” as Classified” material, so HJC should review.
They want the grand jury testimony.
No, it said there is evidence both for and against, but that it was up to the AG to decide.
Barr and Rosenstein determined that (paraphrasing)"if there is no crime to obstruct, there can be no charge of obstruction", and didn't even concede that a sitting President could be indicted. I found that statement very dismissive of Mueller's obstruction evidence.