Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats casually admit their obscene accusations against Trump and his supporters was a sham
FoxNews.com ^ | Mar 14, 2019 | Tammy Bruce | The Washington Times

Posted on 03/14/2019 7:47:33 AM PDT by ETL

For two years, Democrats and their leadership have been haranguing the people of the United States with hysteria claiming that President Trump was an agent of the Russians, stole the election, is mentally disturbed or unfit and obstructed justice -- among other bizarre and crazed accusations.

Yet Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the Democratically-led House, has announced that impeaching Trump is “not worth it.”

In an interview for The Washington Post magazine, conducted on March 6, Mrs. Pelosi said, “I’m not for impeachment. …

This is news. I haven’t said this to any press person before.

But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country.

And he’s just not worth it.”

This new revelation from Mrs. Pelosi is another example of Democrats casually admitting that everything they’ve done to this country through their obscene accusations against the president and his supporters was a sham.

After all, if you believe that the duly elected president of the United States is actually a foreign agent for a nation that has historically been an enemy of this country, you should be shocked at Mrs. Pelosi walking away from the idea of taking action.

Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept made this observation on Twitter:

“Anyone who has ever believed Trump is controlled & blackmailed by Putin to the point that Putin makes Trump treasonously sacrifice America’s interests for Russia’s -- and there are a lot of you -- should be marching in fury in the streets over Pelosi’s refusal to impeach Trump.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: democratcollusion; flexibility; reset; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Political Junkie Too

On reflection, you are correct about Rush.


21 posted on 03/14/2019 8:27:55 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Honduras must be invaded to protect America from invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

In 2017, Pelosi revealed a shady tried-and-true Democrat demonization tactic called the “wrap-up smear.”

PELOSI: “We call it the ‘wrap-up smear.’ You smear somebody, with falsehoods and all the rest, and then you merchandise
it to the media,” Pelosi blithely said at a press conference.......as if she were giving out a recipe for apple pie.

SOUND FAMILIAR? This patented Democrat criminal MO was used against Justice Kavanaugh.


Hillary was good at this——she’d “leak” what she said was damaging info on Trump to the media.
Then when the smear was published-—she’d wave around the clipping to show how she was the superior candidate.


22 posted on 03/14/2019 8:30:06 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

Is it okay if I pray for their comeuppance?


23 posted on 03/14/2019 8:30:08 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ETL
HillaBeans was supposed to win. She was going to have all her people in place like Comey, and we would have been none the wiser about any of her worse than RICO-Hanssen-like activities.

They tried to set Trump up with a Martha Stewart-like charge so that they could put him behind bars after Hillary was safely ensconced in the White House. Why? Just cuz as president she could. She would've had the entire Justice Department and the FBI to bear on Donald Trump.

He was not supposed to win. He was supposed to go to prison in absolute shame.

All that "collusion" stuff is a complete CYA act.

They didn't think about labelling it all "collusion" until Hillary lost and they were having to make it look like what they were doing with the FISA and the Russian lady at the Trump Tower as somehow Trump's fault.

Trump's son supposedly having a meeting with a Russian agent at Trump Tower is a huge frigging deal, but somehow Hillary doing quid pro quo giving away her influence, our Uranium and our national security is not that big a deal.

Wouldn't it be nice if the media began doing their jobs and reported correctly on the Uranium deal?

Hell, somebody at the Washington Post just may get a Pulitzer for the effort.

24 posted on 03/14/2019 8:30:16 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ETL

If Trump is as dangerous as they’ve been claiming, how can they NOT impeach?

lol


25 posted on 03/14/2019 8:33:24 AM PDT by Principled (No one will conquer America, from within or without, until its citizenry are disarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

“There was no scientific reason to take the sample to them, so what other reason could there have been?”

There was no second ‘sample’. It was merely an excuse for Mueller to be the bag man for Hillary.


26 posted on 03/14/2019 8:41:32 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Maybe there was a second ‘sample’. However, it wasn’t of the original stolen uranium from Georgia, it was a sample of what Hillary was selling the Russians the ‘rights’ to.


27 posted on 03/14/2019 8:44:54 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Glenn Greenwald eats jihadi hamashole breakfast, lunch and dinner.


28 posted on 03/14/2019 8:49:30 AM PDT by BTerclinger (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

So she is now colluding with the Russians?


29 posted on 03/14/2019 9:08:43 AM PDT by spudville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Yep, and I can picture a laughing Harry Reid saying, “well, it worked, didn’t it?”


30 posted on 03/14/2019 9:09:26 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred
It is not just a sham. It is a concerted effort to cover up real high crimes. The crine of Uranium One, the crime of spying on a campaign using the FBI and FISA courts, the crime of ...

Democrats intentionally used disinformation from Russia to attack Trump, campaign aides

By Rowan Scarborough
The Washington Times
July 11, 2017

While the mainstream news media hunts for evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, the public record shows that Democrats have willfully used Moscow disinformation to influence the presidential election against Donald Trump and attack his administration.

The disinformation came in the form of a Russian-fed dossier written by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele. It contains a series of unverified criminal charges against Mr. Trump’s campaign aides, such as coordinating Moscow’s hacking of Democratic Party computers.

Some Democrats have widely circulated the discredited information. Mr. Steele was paid by the Democrat-funded opposition research firm Fusion GPS with money from a Hillary Clinton backer. Fusion GPS distributed the dossier among Democrats and journalists. The information fell into the hands of the FBI, which used it in part to investigate Mr. Trump’s campaign aides.

Mr. Steele makes clear that his unproven charges came almost exclusively from sources linked to the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin. He identified his sources as “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure,” a former “top level Russian intelligence officer active inside the Kremlin,” a “senior Kremlin official” and a “senior Russian government official.”

The same Democrats who have condemned Russia’s election interference via plying fake news and hacking email servers have quoted freely from the Steele anti-Trump memos derived from creatures of the Kremlin.

In other words, there is public evidence of significant, indirect collusion between Democrats and Russian disinformation, a Trump supporter said. ...”

Continued at source...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/11/democrats-spread-false-russian-information-on-trum/

Or,

https://web.archive.org/web/20170729142038/http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/11/democrats-spread-false-russian-information-on-trum/

31 posted on 03/14/2019 9:15:54 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

That, and Feinstein questioned about military tribunals this week during a congressional hearing for a judge - don’t recall his name. She wanted to know his thoughts on Military vs civilian trials for domestic terrorism. He stated it would be inappropriate to answer, as he may have to hear some of those cases. Kavanaugh was questioned about military tribunals, as well.

This “Q” is looking more and more legit by the day.


32 posted on 03/14/2019 9:21:57 AM PDT by Tx Angel (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
The "wrap up smear" https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=pelosi+the+wrap+up+smear&view=detail&mid=1C7E214F68707BEA9C621C7E214F68707BEA9C62&FORM=VIRE
33 posted on 03/14/2019 9:25:22 AM PDT by Tx Angel (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: spudville

Yup. They are trying to reclaim what tiny bit of integrity that they once had. They are hoping that it will play well in the upcoming elections.


34 posted on 03/14/2019 9:36:05 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bert

Does this include the derogatory term “teabaggers?”


35 posted on 03/14/2019 9:42:20 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tx Angel

thanks! let’s make sure that stays viral!!


36 posted on 03/14/2019 11:31:29 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ETL
As noted in the header this piece was originally posted in The Washington Times.

With the title:

More displays of fraud from Democrats

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/13/in-a-display-of-democratic-fraud-nancy-pelosi-says/

37 posted on 03/14/2019 11:59:46 AM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tx Angel
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=pelosi+the+wrap+up+smear&view=detail&mid=1C7E214F68707BEA9C621C7E214F68707BEA9C62&FORM=VIRE

Hot link

38 posted on 03/14/2019 12:01:10 PM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=pelosi+the+wrap+up+smear&view=detail&mid=1C7E214F68707BEA9C621C7E214F68707BEA9C62&FORM=VIRE


39 posted on 03/14/2019 12:01:31 PM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Thanks for correcting that. At work and I think I posted too quickly.


40 posted on 03/14/2019 12:15:14 PM PDT by Tx Angel (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson