To: NorthMountain
IF it was stand alone, it probably would be Constitutional, but this is an agreement with other states for political purposes, and requires the approval of Congress. That’s what makes it unConstitutional.
18 posted on
02/25/2019 12:36:52 PM PST by
jjotto
(Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
To: jjotto
and requires the approval of Congress. Where do you get that?
26 posted on
02/25/2019 12:40:50 PM PST by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: jjotto
but this is an agreement with other states for political purposes, and requires the approval of Congress Good point.
43 posted on
02/25/2019 12:47:49 PM PST by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: jjotto
There’s another problem: it encourages Democrat states to allow noncitizens to vote. The more, the better....
47 posted on
02/25/2019 12:49:21 PM PST by
Ford4000
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson