For sure she is one of the absolute worst. However, she has some strong competition - Louis Brandeis, William J. Brennan, William O. Douglas, Earl Warren, and lately Kagan, and Sotomayor rank right up there too.
These tyrants in black robes hang on forever. They get decades to p!ss all over the Constitution.
we agree about Sotomoyer and Kagan for sure
Brandeis had some good points to make...(the dangers of permitting monopolists to seize control of... and destroy our free competitive economic markets, some need for government to respect an individual’s privacy, etc.).....despite his lefty political leanings (which would be quite unpopular here for sure)............ and he was positively brilliant and I believe very honest. I am glad some of the current people on the court are so lacking of his intellect... but I sure wish they had even half his integrity. Again, we agree I am sure about many of his opinions...
Douglas was a very interesting man, worth hearing from ...often saw issues or aspects of cases that other folks were blind to, or just ignored.......... but yes I agree about most of his decisions being on the bad side of issues most of the time. I was very glad indeed when he was replaced on the Ct.
From what I can tell, Sotomeyer, Kagan, and Ginsberg should never ever have been put on the court.... never in a million years! Disasterous
And I am worried more and more about Roberts