Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Revel

Can’t the private landowners whose property is along the border agree to private wall construction?


14 posted on 12/21/2018 1:53:38 AM PST by ScottinVA (The most urgent gathering threat to America: the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ScottinVA

I believe the government maintains an easement.
Attempting to get every land owner on board for 1000 miles is going to be beyond a little rough.


15 posted on 12/21/2018 1:58:16 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: ScottinVA

Emminent Domain


80 posted on 12/21/2018 6:38:08 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: ScottinVA

“Can’t the private landowners whose property is along the border agree to private wall construction?”

Not only that, but the Kelo v. City of New London emninent domain SCOTUS decicion would likely allow private wall construction to go forward anyway through private companies even if they don’t agree. I believe authorization for wall construction would already be approved through the secure fence act that George W Bush signed. So it shouldn’t matter if funds went directly to private contractors.


82 posted on 12/21/2018 6:46:23 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: ScottinVA
Can’t the private landowners whose property is along the border agree to private wall construction?

They could, but most of the money would have to pay for required environmental studies.

110 posted on 12/21/2018 10:45:36 AM PST by aimhigh (1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson